Aug. 21, 2026

Unmasking AI Hype: Truth Mode, Content Slop, & more Dr. Arshavir Blackwell | Bankedoutt Radio Show

Unmasking AI Hype: Truth Mode, Content Slop, & more Dr. Arshavir Blackwell | Bankedoutt Radio Show
Music & Business Talk | Bankedoutt Radio Show
Unmasking AI Hype: Truth Mode, Content Slop, & more Dr. Arshavir Blackwell | Bankedoutt Radio Show

E Book: https://payhip.com/b/YAFri

Episode Summary

In this high-velocity episode of Bankedoutt Radio Show, Media Producer and CEO Andreas Cooke sits down with 30-year artificial intelligence veteran and cognitive scientist Dr. Arshavir Blackwell. Moving completely past the generic corporate marketing hype, they pull back the curtain on how AI models actually compute language, the dangerous rise of automated "content slop," and how small business owners can install defensive systems to protect their authentic brand voice.

Whether you are looking to scale your local SEO, safely automate your operational bottlenecks, or understand the future of human productivity, Dr. Blackwell delivers a data-backed field manual for the modern entrepreneur.

⏱️ Jump Straight to the Insights: Time-Stamped Breakdown

01:10 — The Dual-Edged Sword: An honest look at the direct advantages and hidden disadvantages of modern AI tools in commercial spaces.

03:40 — Demystifying Local LLMs: What "Local Large Language Models" actually are, and why hosting an AI model on your own private hardware is a massive security win for your business. 10:54 — The Search Engine Edge: Advanced frameworks for using AI to radically speed up your local SEO strategy without getting penalized by search algorithms.

12:42 — Exposing "AI Slop": Breaking down the modern terminology of digital slop, specifically focusing on the deceptive rise of artificial food imagery in retail and restaurant marketing.

14:30 — The Information Verification Protocol: A step-by-step human verification process to safely audit, fact-check, and double-verify the data that AI platforms present to you.

19:00 — Activating "Truth Mode": How to force your artificial intelligence tools out of generic consensus mode and into high-integrity, data-driven "Truth Mode."

21:30 — The Shift in Perspective: How smart entrepreneurs must fundamentally reframe their mental model of AI to view it as a collaborative assistant rather than a human replacement.

25:00 — The Software Velocity Shift: A masterclass on the total transformation of business productivity and scaling workflows ahead of the market curve.

45:50 — What Everyone Gets Wrong: Dr. Blackwell drops a hard-hitting reality check on the single biggest misconception the general public harbors about artificial intelligence.

https://arshavir.jellypod.com/episodes/82bb94da-d929-4768-93fe-acbfcae1bf3e

Website https://arvoinen.ai/

Substack: https://arshavirblackwell.substack.com/

BRS: https://www.musicandbusinesstalk.com

Newsletter: https://www.musicandbusinesstalk.com/newsletter/

Sig up to get your podcast website streamlined https://www.musicandbusinesstalk.com/podpage

WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.800
Hey y 'all, welcome back to Bankedoutt Radio Show

00:00:01.800 --> 00:00:05.519
Music and Business Talk. Every single business

00:00:05.519 --> 00:00:08.460
owner is being bombarded with a tech marketing

00:00:08.460 --> 00:00:10.839
hype telling them to let AI run their company.

00:00:11.619 --> 00:00:14.880
But what happens when your brand loses its heartbeat?

00:00:15.759 --> 00:00:18.739
Our guest today has been building artificial

00:00:18.739 --> 00:00:22.300
intelligence since long before it became a trending

00:00:22.300 --> 00:00:26.559
buzzword. Dr. Arshavir Blackwell holds a PhD

00:00:26.559 --> 00:00:29.199
in cognitive science and brings over 30 years

00:00:29.199 --> 00:00:32.899
of raw frontline tech experience to the table.

00:00:33.539 --> 00:00:35.799
He is an elite strategist who helps creators

00:00:35.799 --> 00:00:38.640
and founders leverage advanced machine learning

00:00:38.640 --> 00:00:42.079
without losing their unique sovereign human voice.

00:00:43.060 --> 00:00:46.320
Dr. Blackwell, welcome to the platform. Thank

00:00:46.320 --> 00:00:50.759
you very much. It's great to be here. So there

00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:54.469
is a a couple of videos I was watching as in

00:00:54.469 --> 00:00:56.530
preparation for this interview that you did.

00:00:58.350 --> 00:01:01.490
And one of the things I wanted to get into is

00:01:01.490 --> 00:01:06.409
understanding like AI, how consumers use it.

00:01:06.689 --> 00:01:12.430
So like, you know, chat, GPT, little Gemini are

00:01:12.430 --> 00:01:16.269
from my understanding, like the frontier of AI.

00:01:17.290 --> 00:01:19.430
And then those are the frontier models. That's

00:01:19.430 --> 00:01:23.239
right. You also have what you call the local

00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:26.939
model. Yes. Which is running the application

00:01:26.939 --> 00:01:30.159
basically on your own particular device. Can

00:01:30.159 --> 00:01:33.280
you give us a little more brief explanation of

00:01:33.280 --> 00:01:38.180
what that is? Sure. So Frontier models are the

00:01:38.180 --> 00:01:40.980
ones that everybody probably, for the most part,

00:01:41.140 --> 00:01:46.640
is using. And those are things like Claude, JetGPT,

00:01:46.900 --> 00:01:51.439
Gemini, and so forth. those are all running in

00:01:51.439 --> 00:01:55.079
the cloud. And the advantages of them are they're

00:01:55.079 --> 00:01:58.459
very powerful, of course, as we all know. The

00:01:58.459 --> 00:02:01.540
disadvantages of them are amongst, well, first

00:02:01.540 --> 00:02:03.519
of all, they get to be expensive. If you use

00:02:03.519 --> 00:02:06.280
them a lot, you notice that you're burning through

00:02:06.280 --> 00:02:08.680
a lot of tokens, and that can add up very quickly.

00:02:09.719 --> 00:02:11.860
The other disadvantage, well, there's actually

00:02:11.860 --> 00:02:14.419
two other disadvantages. One is it's not secure.

00:02:14.650 --> 00:02:18.030
So you can't really expect that whatever you're

00:02:18.030 --> 00:02:23.030
going to send out over the wire is going to be

00:02:23.030 --> 00:02:26.150
preserved and secure and safe. They could very

00:02:26.150 --> 00:02:30.349
well use what you're sending them for training

00:02:30.349 --> 00:02:32.990
for their own material. And of course people

00:02:32.990 --> 00:02:35.370
can intercept along the way and there's other

00:02:35.370 --> 00:02:39.110
security concerns as well. The other thing that

00:02:39.110 --> 00:02:42.110
a frontier model cannot do is it can't really

00:02:42.110 --> 00:02:45.930
speak in your own voice. And the reason for that

00:02:45.930 --> 00:02:48.469
is because you can't really, they're trained

00:02:48.469 --> 00:02:51.689
already. They come pre -trained. When I work

00:02:51.689 --> 00:02:53.909
with a local business in Macon, Georgia, we took

00:02:53.909 --> 00:02:57.069
their operational revenue from 45K to 88K in

00:02:57.069 --> 00:02:59.849
a single year. How? We didn't chase social media

00:02:59.849 --> 00:03:02.870
clout. We found hidden billing programs, cut

00:03:02.870 --> 00:03:05.669
cash based operational leaks, and fixed their

00:03:05.669 --> 00:03:07.569
pricing structures. Most independent creators,

00:03:07.810 --> 00:03:09.849
bookkeepers, and estheticians are amazing at

00:03:09.849 --> 00:03:12.409
their craft, but they run their back ends like

00:03:12.409 --> 00:03:14.789
an expensive charity. They carry uncollected

00:03:14.789 --> 00:03:17.210
fees and think customers would just appear out

00:03:17.210 --> 00:03:19.370
of nowhere. Don't let operational blindness kill

00:03:19.370 --> 00:03:21.789
your vision. The worksheets inside my guy will

00:03:21.789 --> 00:03:24.449
help you audit your company structure in 48 hours.

00:03:24.569 --> 00:03:27.129
Grab your copy right now for $19 .99. Type here

00:03:27.129 --> 00:03:29.110
to buy the e -book. I mean, that's in the name,

00:03:29.169 --> 00:03:33.340
right? So because of that. There's really no

00:03:33.340 --> 00:03:35.680
way, there are no levers that you can use to

00:03:35.680 --> 00:03:38.719
really change what the nature of the output is,

00:03:39.340 --> 00:03:41.400
other than what you put in the prompt. And what

00:03:41.400 --> 00:03:43.860
we find is that the prompt is really not a very

00:03:43.860 --> 00:03:46.740
good way to do that. So you can give it instructions

00:03:46.740 --> 00:03:50.599
about what you want it to sound like in the prompt.

00:03:51.199 --> 00:03:54.280
But what happens very often is you get a costume.

00:03:54.780 --> 00:03:57.979
So you don't get genuine sounding, authentic

00:03:57.979 --> 00:04:02.110
changes. You get a sort of performative version

00:04:02.110 --> 00:04:04.590
where it just sounds very fake and it sounds

00:04:04.590 --> 00:04:08.289
like it's kind of trying to put on whatever tone

00:04:08.289 --> 00:04:10.770
you've asked it to do, but it really can't do

00:04:10.770 --> 00:04:13.689
that. Now what I work with are what are called

00:04:13.689 --> 00:04:17.290
local large language models, and they're local

00:04:17.290 --> 00:04:20.430
because you can run them either on your own computer

00:04:20.430 --> 00:04:24.110
or we run them also on a dedicated server, but

00:04:24.110 --> 00:04:26.129
one that's not connected to Frontier models,

00:04:26.209 --> 00:04:30.259
one that's not connected to chat GPT. And you

00:04:30.259 --> 00:04:34.860
can actually train those on your own material.

00:04:35.899 --> 00:04:40.180
And those are not in their responses performative.

00:04:40.519 --> 00:04:42.720
Because when you train it on your own material,

00:04:43.060 --> 00:04:45.459
you're not training it through the prompt. You're

00:04:45.459 --> 00:04:48.860
actually changing the nature of the learning

00:04:48.860 --> 00:04:52.660
in the model. And so what we do is we can actually

00:04:52.660 --> 00:04:56.040
have it read. Let's say you have a blog or a

00:04:56.040 --> 00:04:59.800
substack or a bunch of marketing material. it

00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:02.620
actually reads through all of that and retrains

00:05:02.620 --> 00:05:08.579
itself to speak in your voice. And the advantage

00:05:08.579 --> 00:05:10.680
of that is that you don't have to spend a lot

00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:14.819
of time on chat GPT or on cloud having it write

00:05:14.819 --> 00:05:16.540
something and then having you have to rewrite

00:05:16.540 --> 00:05:19.120
it. I mean, it kind of misses the whole point

00:05:19.120 --> 00:05:22.019
when you have to do that. So that's basically

00:05:22.019 --> 00:05:24.720
what we're working with here is a local model

00:05:24.720 --> 00:05:27.560
that's safe. It's much cheaper because you're

00:05:27.560 --> 00:05:30.560
not burning up tokens on some huge frontier model.

00:05:31.100 --> 00:05:34.860
And it's trained on your own voice. So it sounds

00:05:34.860 --> 00:05:38.439
like you. How long would it take to be able to

00:05:38.439 --> 00:05:42.199
do that, to train your own voice? How much material

00:05:42.199 --> 00:05:47.060
would you have to input into it? Yeah. So the

00:05:47.060 --> 00:05:49.720
training time is maybe 10 minutes, 15 minutes

00:05:49.720 --> 00:05:53.560
max. It's not very long. And you only have to

00:05:53.560 --> 00:05:55.560
do that the first time you use it. And then after

00:05:55.560 --> 00:05:58.920
that, it's already trained. The more information

00:05:58.920 --> 00:06:01.720
it has, so let's say you have a large size blog,

00:06:01.920 --> 00:06:05.519
it would certainly be enough. If you have a lot

00:06:05.519 --> 00:06:08.540
of emails that you've written, so they're all

00:06:08.540 --> 00:06:11.420
in your own voice, that would be enough. With

00:06:11.420 --> 00:06:14.920
mine, I train it on about... oh, 50 ,000 words

00:06:14.920 --> 00:06:17.259
and it does pretty well. And that would be kind

00:06:17.259 --> 00:06:20.379
of, that's not huge, but that's kind of the size

00:06:20.379 --> 00:06:24.519
of maybe a medium sized blog or mixed in there

00:06:24.519 --> 00:06:27.300
with perhaps marketing documents that you've

00:06:27.300 --> 00:06:29.839
got or some other material. So it doesn't have

00:06:29.839 --> 00:06:31.620
to be just one thing. Now, if you want it to

00:06:31.620 --> 00:06:34.000
be in a particular style, everything that's written

00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:37.040
in it. So if you're doing marketing for a certain

00:06:37.040 --> 00:06:40.360
product, you shouldn't mix it in with your blog

00:06:40.360 --> 00:06:42.800
about cooking. or something like that. Those

00:06:42.800 --> 00:06:46.980
should be two separate ones. But you can actually

00:06:46.980 --> 00:06:51.360
get a pretty good result with a relatively small

00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:53.860
amount of information trained relatively quickly.

00:06:57.420 --> 00:07:00.939
So, Dears, you've been in this space for 30 years.

00:07:01.139 --> 00:07:04.240
Yeah. How are people using it wrong nowadays,

00:07:04.339 --> 00:07:06.699
especially when it comes to small business owners?

00:07:08.040 --> 00:07:11.139
Well, I've been doing this since before it was

00:07:11.139 --> 00:07:13.699
called AI back when I first started doing it.

00:07:13.839 --> 00:07:16.120
We called it neural networks. And that's essentially

00:07:16.120 --> 00:07:18.800
what we're calling AI now is basically just a

00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:23.600
very, very sophisticated neural network. I started

00:07:23.600 --> 00:07:26.740
at UCSD and I was very, very fortunate to work

00:07:26.740 --> 00:07:29.480
with two of the pioneers in the field of neural

00:07:29.480 --> 00:07:31.660
networks. Elizabeth Bates, who was a linguist

00:07:31.660 --> 00:07:34.180
who did a lot of work in understanding out humans

00:07:34.180 --> 00:07:36.699
process language, but how neural network could

00:07:36.699 --> 00:07:39.660
do it as well. And then her colleague, Jeff Elman,

00:07:39.839 --> 00:07:42.899
who was also someone who did a lot of the real

00:07:42.899 --> 00:07:46.379
pioneering works with neural networks and artificial

00:07:46.379 --> 00:07:50.720
intelligence. What was happening back then that's

00:07:50.720 --> 00:07:53.459
contrasted with now and what it's really changed

00:07:53.459 --> 00:08:00.180
is the models were much smaller and the designs

00:08:00.180 --> 00:08:03.459
for the models were small but also the computers

00:08:03.459 --> 00:08:07.939
that we were running them on were you know much

00:08:07.939 --> 00:08:11.160
less powerful than these huge data centers that

00:08:11.160 --> 00:08:13.680
we have access to today. I mean orders and orders

00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:16.980
of magnitude difference. So what happened was

00:08:16.980 --> 00:08:20.839
about oh you know maybe four or five years ago

00:08:21.259 --> 00:08:25.459
there was a sort of revolution that came about

00:08:25.459 --> 00:08:30.000
as a confluence of new algorithms, more powerful

00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:35.779
kinds of computers to run them on, parallel algorithms,

00:08:36.100 --> 00:08:38.860
parallel computers. And that's where we've gotten

00:08:38.860 --> 00:08:43.580
to today. Now, the thing is that a lot of, I

00:08:43.580 --> 00:08:46.919
hope that a lot of businesses are at least dabbling

00:08:46.919 --> 00:08:51.000
in or getting used to using things like chat

00:08:51.000 --> 00:08:54.539
GPT and Claude, because these are very, very

00:08:54.539 --> 00:08:58.779
powerful tools. And you can do I mean, literally,

00:08:58.779 --> 00:09:02.720
I'm able to do weeks worth of work in a few hours.

00:09:02.960 --> 00:09:06.039
So if you get to know them, well, it can really

00:09:06.039 --> 00:09:09.279
as a small business owner, it can really be a

00:09:09.279 --> 00:09:13.059
huge benefit. But the problem that we see is

00:09:13.059 --> 00:09:16.549
very often people have businesses And there are

00:09:16.549 --> 00:09:19.830
studies to show this. When these systems are

00:09:19.830 --> 00:09:23.330
implemented and when they fail, a big problem

00:09:23.330 --> 00:09:28.889
is that businesses don't integrate the AI workflow

00:09:28.889 --> 00:09:32.529
into the rest of their work. So the AI becomes

00:09:32.529 --> 00:09:39.090
sort of this thing over there that is bolted

00:09:39.090 --> 00:09:42.970
on, I guess you could say. to the workflow and

00:09:42.970 --> 00:09:46.210
people are copying pasting from that back to

00:09:46.210 --> 00:09:48.490
their regular workflow and then back to the you

00:09:48.490 --> 00:09:54.190
know the AI system and so on and so forth and

00:09:54.190 --> 00:09:57.230
so because of that a lot of people really just

00:09:57.230 --> 00:09:59.590
kind of give up on using it because they don't

00:09:59.590 --> 00:10:01.490
really understand the power of it and they don't

00:10:01.490 --> 00:10:03.570
understand how to integrate it into their work

00:10:03.570 --> 00:10:06.350
so I would say as a small business person my

00:10:06.350 --> 00:10:09.639
first Suggestion to be really like use this stuff

00:10:09.639 --> 00:10:11.860
so that you really feel comfortable with it But

00:10:11.860 --> 00:10:15.139
second of all you need to figure out how to integrate

00:10:15.139 --> 00:10:18.679
it into your ongoing workflow and not Throw it

00:10:18.679 --> 00:10:21.120
at the people that are doing the work and just

00:10:21.120 --> 00:10:24.539
say, you know, good luck. Here we go Do what

00:10:24.539 --> 00:10:26.840
you can with it they need to people sort of need

00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:30.240
to be led to the right ways and the right use

00:10:30.240 --> 00:10:37.360
cases and the proper ways to integrate AI into

00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:39.279
their workflow. And that's a lot of work in and

00:10:39.279 --> 00:10:42.080
of itself. Yeah, I definitely get that because

00:10:42.080 --> 00:10:44.779
I would say that like one of the things I use

00:10:44.779 --> 00:10:47.799
AI for is with my podcast and my show notes.

00:10:48.179 --> 00:10:51.639
Yeah. So what I do after every single interview,

00:10:52.299 --> 00:10:56.360
I write a paragraph or two of what we discussed.

00:10:56.879 --> 00:11:00.600
Right. And then I have AI like, you know, match

00:11:00.600 --> 00:11:03.139
it or put it into the prompt until it's like,

00:11:03.139 --> 00:11:04.899
you know, based off the information I'm feeding

00:11:04.899 --> 00:11:08.220
it. It's writing a good description to where,

00:11:08.419 --> 00:11:12.159
when I post it on YouTube, and also like PiePage,

00:11:12.799 --> 00:11:17.620
it's able to be scoured by the internet. So therefore

00:11:17.620 --> 00:11:19.919
those keywords and all that start to show up

00:11:19.919 --> 00:11:23.440
and they're used in that language for the search

00:11:23.440 --> 00:11:25.539
engine. And I've seen that with my videos. They've

00:11:25.539 --> 00:11:28.419
been crawling higher and higher on Google search

00:11:28.419 --> 00:11:32.840
engines. Right. So you're using the AI basically

00:11:32.840 --> 00:11:36.149
to phrase things in a way that search engine

00:11:36.149 --> 00:11:39.990
optimization is going to pick up on. Yes. And

00:11:39.990 --> 00:11:42.230
that's a very good use of it. And I think that

00:11:42.230 --> 00:11:45.330
people are beginning to figure out how to integrate

00:11:45.330 --> 00:11:50.090
SEO search engine optimization with techniques

00:11:50.090 --> 00:11:52.850
like chat GPT or local models or whatever it

00:11:52.850 --> 00:11:54.870
is they're using. So that's actually a great,

00:11:54.870 --> 00:11:57.570
great. I mean, have you found it to be, it sounds

00:11:57.570 --> 00:12:00.429
like you found it to be successful. You're getting

00:12:00.429 --> 00:12:04.679
more hits on your podcasts and it it's working

00:12:04.679 --> 00:12:09.820
for you. Yeah. I don't like, you know, some people

00:12:09.820 --> 00:12:11.960
like even with like the thumbnails and stuff,

00:12:12.240 --> 00:12:14.440
I love pictures and things that I mentioned instead

00:12:14.440 --> 00:12:16.559
of trying to get it to create something just

00:12:16.559 --> 00:12:21.220
from typing in prompts. Yeah. And the artwork

00:12:21.220 --> 00:12:25.000
looks way better than a lot of people. So for

00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:27.080
example, people use it to let's say they have

00:12:27.080 --> 00:12:30.419
a small business and they deal with food. Yeah.

00:12:30.419 --> 00:12:33.039
Using a lot of AI generated food looking stuff

00:12:33.039 --> 00:12:35.200
in the mic. your cooking stuff doesn't even look

00:12:35.200 --> 00:12:37.519
like that, so a lot of people are rejecting those

00:12:37.519 --> 00:12:41.539
type of flyers and thumbnails and stuff. That's

00:12:41.539 --> 00:12:45.019
a problem, and there is a big issue, and I read

00:12:45.019 --> 00:12:48.600
a lot about this because it's, you know, out

00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:51.000
there, but also it's actually a topic I'm interested

00:12:51.000 --> 00:12:53.820
in. There's a big, it's very interesting because

00:12:53.820 --> 00:12:57.460
there's some people that feel as though AI is

00:12:57.460 --> 00:13:00.149
great and a blessing and it's going to do a lot

00:13:00.149 --> 00:13:04.070
for us. But there's also a very active school

00:13:04.070 --> 00:13:08.149
of thought out there that is in to greater and

00:13:08.149 --> 00:13:12.789
lesser degrees against using AI in these various

00:13:12.789 --> 00:13:16.210
business processes. Some of those are as simple

00:13:16.210 --> 00:13:18.110
as what you're talking about. Like, oh, the picture

00:13:18.110 --> 00:13:20.850
looks like it's AI, it's AI slop. That's the

00:13:20.850 --> 00:13:24.940
term people always use, AI slop. real food doesn't

00:13:24.940 --> 00:13:27.860
really look like that. Now there are ways to

00:13:27.860 --> 00:13:31.820
use AI in a way that you don't get AI slop. And

00:13:31.820 --> 00:13:33.919
the one thing that I think is really important

00:13:33.919 --> 00:13:37.019
and I always tell people is don't just take what

00:13:37.019 --> 00:13:41.179
the AI gives you and throw it out there. What

00:13:41.179 --> 00:13:44.980
you need to do is you need to test and check

00:13:44.980 --> 00:13:47.419
every single thing that it tells you because

00:13:47.419 --> 00:13:50.120
AI can be wrong and people don't realize that.

00:13:50.500 --> 00:13:54.289
One thing that AI is very good at is producing

00:13:54.289 --> 00:14:00.210
very slick, nice, what I call fluent looking

00:14:00.210 --> 00:14:04.049
output. So it looks really right. And I've written

00:14:04.049 --> 00:14:06.470
an article about this called Fluency is Validity.

00:14:06.730 --> 00:14:09.529
And the risk is that when something looks really

00:14:09.529 --> 00:14:11.850
right, looks well written, looks like it's arguing

00:14:11.850 --> 00:14:15.450
well, people very often, which is what AI is

00:14:15.450 --> 00:14:18.250
very strong at doing, people very often accept

00:14:18.250 --> 00:14:21.549
that at face value. and don't necessarily dive

00:14:21.549 --> 00:14:24.610
into what the actual argument is and whether

00:14:24.610 --> 00:14:29.129
it has merit or not. So AI can get take the most

00:14:29.129 --> 00:14:32.929
ridiculous sounding idea and make it sound very

00:14:32.929 --> 00:14:35.470
believable because that's what it's kind of programmed

00:14:35.470 --> 00:14:37.909
to do. It's programmed to continue to engage

00:14:37.909 --> 00:14:41.649
you. It's programmed to make you think that what

00:14:41.649 --> 00:14:43.970
you're talking about is the greatest idea in

00:14:43.970 --> 00:14:47.549
the world. We call this significance. And that's

00:14:47.549 --> 00:14:49.470
something that people have to guard against in

00:14:49.470 --> 00:14:51.929
any field, whether it's business or academia

00:14:51.929 --> 00:14:54.909
or whatever they're using it for. And there are

00:14:54.909 --> 00:14:57.789
a whole bunch of techniques that you can use

00:14:57.789 --> 00:15:00.909
and that people, I think, need to be more aware

00:15:00.909 --> 00:15:03.809
of that are actually good techniques when you're

00:15:03.809 --> 00:15:06.750
just dealing with media in general. So not even

00:15:06.750 --> 00:15:12.549
just AI, but also just Ways to verify and validate

00:15:12.549 --> 00:15:14.830
when you read an article whether it's generated

00:15:14.830 --> 00:15:17.970
by AI or whether it's generated by a human being

00:15:17.970 --> 00:15:21.149
or some combination thereof You need to check

00:15:21.149 --> 00:15:23.429
and verify every single thing in there and not

00:15:23.429 --> 00:15:26.070
take it for face value And I think that that's

00:15:26.070 --> 00:15:29.610
kind of the key to keeping a lot of this technology

00:15:29.610 --> 00:15:35.250
useful But not harming people Yeah, one things

00:15:35.250 --> 00:15:39.450
I discovered was like truth mode telling it to

00:15:39.450 --> 00:15:43.590
give me truthful answers that are based off of

00:15:43.590 --> 00:15:46.809
data. And now, like you said, talk to me like,

00:15:47.269 --> 00:15:49.529
oh, your ideas are great. And now that's why

00:15:49.529 --> 00:15:52.769
this was work, especially when it comes to marketing.

00:15:53.129 --> 00:15:56.289
Because I think a lot of times we're misled.

00:15:56.669 --> 00:16:00.470
Like you said, it's a believing that it sounds

00:16:00.470 --> 00:16:03.549
good. Right. But what's the old saying? If it

00:16:03.549 --> 00:16:07.029
sounds too good to be true, it's not. It probably

00:16:07.029 --> 00:16:09.850
is. Yeah. So I'm curious what, so when you use

00:16:09.850 --> 00:16:11.730
truth mode, what do you do exactly? How does

00:16:11.730 --> 00:16:15.070
that work for you? So me with creative ideas

00:16:15.070 --> 00:16:20.830
and also marketing driven data. So for instance,

00:16:21.049 --> 00:16:25.409
I'll give this example. I was asking about small

00:16:25.409 --> 00:16:27.850
businesses, especially in particular to like.

00:16:28.670 --> 00:16:33.029
how small businesses look at marketing and advertising

00:16:33.029 --> 00:16:35.429
and investing in their company. And it was telling

00:16:35.429 --> 00:16:39.649
me like, you know, what percentage of small businesses

00:16:39.649 --> 00:16:43.269
are using like, you know, AI and running marketing

00:16:43.269 --> 00:16:45.649
strategies and stuff like that. And then I wanted

00:16:45.649 --> 00:16:48.129
to go into more of a subsection of like, okay,

00:16:48.289 --> 00:16:52.470
so now black owned businesses, do they use marketing?

00:16:52.669 --> 00:16:54.190
And I was like, yeah, they rely on this and that

00:16:54.190 --> 00:16:56.419
and all this stuff. And then I was going back

00:16:56.419 --> 00:16:58.019
and forth with it because I was telling it based

00:16:58.019 --> 00:16:59.960
on my experience of, you know, doing marketing

00:16:59.960 --> 00:17:02.139
for 20 years and working a lot with black owned

00:17:02.139 --> 00:17:06.359
businesses. The ones I run across and of course,

00:17:06.359 --> 00:17:07.839
you know, you can't group everybody together

00:17:07.839 --> 00:17:10.240
because everybody's business is different. Right.

00:17:10.299 --> 00:17:14.400
But generally speaking, if they fall within,

00:17:14.619 --> 00:17:17.940
let's say that I like to call the infancy stage

00:17:17.940 --> 00:17:20.099
or whatever, you know, zero years to just getting

00:17:20.099 --> 00:17:22.559
started to about three or four years. Right.

00:17:22.559 --> 00:17:26.589
It was negative condensation. when it comes to

00:17:26.589 --> 00:17:29.349
wanting to spend money on marketing and thinking

00:17:29.349 --> 00:17:31.970
that they could just do everything for free basically

00:17:31.970 --> 00:17:35.329
on social media and not get somebody's third

00:17:35.329 --> 00:17:39.750
party's perspective on how they should brand

00:17:39.750 --> 00:17:41.970
their business in order to attract the clients

00:17:41.970 --> 00:17:45.170
and understand that it's a process with like

00:17:45.170 --> 00:17:49.250
a sales funnel and all that. And when I was getting

00:17:49.250 --> 00:17:51.009
the information from AI, I was like, you know,

00:17:51.009 --> 00:17:54.420
just basically trying to give me like data, but

00:17:54.420 --> 00:17:57.220
in truth, I was like, no, this is not being the

00:17:57.220 --> 00:17:59.460
experiences I've had. I've actually have a lot

00:17:59.460 --> 00:18:01.539
of people who actually run from it because they're

00:18:01.539 --> 00:18:04.759
fearful and they also have like a like a trauma

00:18:04.759 --> 00:18:08.299
associated with doing this because they will

00:18:08.299 --> 00:18:12.700
have an experience with maybe somebody and they'll

00:18:12.700 --> 00:18:15.220
have that bad experience. So then they group

00:18:15.220 --> 00:18:18.339
everybody else who could help them with their

00:18:18.339 --> 00:18:23.140
business within marketing in the same they'll

00:18:23.140 --> 00:18:26.980
put them in the same monolithic group. It's harder

00:18:26.980 --> 00:18:29.940
to get that sale, the next person who comes behind

00:18:29.940 --> 00:18:32.799
someone, whoever gave someone a bad experience.

00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:36.160
Right. So they overgeneralized from one bad to

00:18:36.160 --> 00:18:39.759
another. Yeah, it did. And then when I was going

00:18:39.759 --> 00:18:42.599
back and forth with that, we gained to a consensus

00:18:42.599 --> 00:18:49.240
like, no, you're right, that this isn't... everyone

00:18:49.240 --> 00:18:52.779
doesn't just look at stuff from this, I guess,

00:18:52.960 --> 00:18:58.779
generic point of view. Yeah. So it was very interesting.

00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:01.059
And then I always ask it, are you still in truth

00:19:01.059 --> 00:19:02.440
mode? Because I don't like to take them out of

00:19:02.440 --> 00:19:05.420
truth mode. Because I won't, when I have ideas,

00:19:05.640 --> 00:19:11.619
especially creative ideas, and how will this

00:19:11.619 --> 00:19:14.619
idea, you know, what's the, I guess the probability

00:19:14.619 --> 00:19:17.819
of it doing well in the marketplace? Yeah. I

00:19:17.819 --> 00:19:20.819
want something that's based off of data and what

00:19:20.819 --> 00:19:22.779
other people have done that's probably similar

00:19:22.779 --> 00:19:26.019
to it. And that's something that's just going

00:19:26.019 --> 00:19:29.859
to agree with me. If it doesn't, if it's a bad

00:19:29.859 --> 00:19:33.920
idea, just tell me it's a bad idea. Right. And

00:19:33.920 --> 00:19:35.920
that's the problem is a lot of times. So do you

00:19:35.920 --> 00:19:38.079
find when you put it in truth mode, is it actually

00:19:38.079 --> 00:19:42.259
truthful? I've had some things that really appear

00:19:42.259 --> 00:19:46.180
to be truthful. Of course, like you said, it

00:19:46.180 --> 00:19:49.599
can make some mistakes, but I think I use AI

00:19:49.599 --> 00:19:51.799
differently than a lot of other people because

00:19:51.799 --> 00:19:55.759
I'm going back and forth with it until I know

00:19:55.759 --> 00:19:57.900
based off of my experience and education of what

00:19:57.900 --> 00:20:00.599
I've been able to do and what would more than

00:20:00.599 --> 00:20:03.759
likely be the outcome if this particular strategy

00:20:03.759 --> 00:20:06.519
was implemented as opposed to, you know, just

00:20:06.519 --> 00:20:11.089
taking everything at face value. So I don't know

00:20:11.089 --> 00:20:13.109
if I don't I don't know a lot of people will

00:20:13.109 --> 00:20:16.710
go back and forth with it. Yeah. So you're saying

00:20:16.710 --> 00:20:20.890
most people just type something in and get something

00:20:20.890 --> 00:20:24.410
out and then they run with that. And you have

00:20:24.410 --> 00:20:27.569
a dialogue with it. I do every single time I'm

00:20:27.569 --> 00:20:31.710
having to die for with it. That's very helpful.

00:20:32.309 --> 00:20:35.269
Exactly. Because that's and that's the thing

00:20:35.269 --> 00:20:38.980
is that's an aspect of it. of AI that I think

00:20:38.980 --> 00:20:43.160
that a lot of people aren't really using. And

00:20:43.160 --> 00:20:47.019
that's what I do as well. So many people just

00:20:47.019 --> 00:20:48.759
say, oh, I'm going to type something in. It's

00:20:48.759 --> 00:20:50.259
like a search engine. It's going to give me an

00:20:50.259 --> 00:20:52.359
answer. And I'll just paste that in. But actually,

00:20:52.720 --> 00:20:57.960
it can be much more useful as a thought partner.

00:20:58.960 --> 00:21:02.019
And so to do exactly the kinds of things you're

00:21:02.019 --> 00:21:04.539
doing where you're saying, oh, here's an idea

00:21:04.539 --> 00:21:06.720
I had. What are the good aspects of it? But what

00:21:06.720 --> 00:21:08.839
are the, you know, tell me some of the reasons

00:21:08.839 --> 00:21:11.799
maybe this isn't a good idea. And then have it

00:21:11.799 --> 00:21:14.660
give you its response. And then you say, but

00:21:14.660 --> 00:21:17.099
what about this? What about that? What about

00:21:17.099 --> 00:21:22.259
the other thing? And a good AI system can help

00:21:22.259 --> 00:21:26.200
to expose a lot of the assumptions in a lot of

00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:29.640
the ideas. that you're working through, but you're

00:21:29.640 --> 00:21:32.880
not going to get that if you just type in a single

00:21:32.880 --> 00:21:36.220
prompt and get a response and paste it in. And

00:21:36.220 --> 00:21:40.259
I think that's where a lot of the value of AI

00:21:40.259 --> 00:21:43.960
is being left on the table. People are using

00:21:43.960 --> 00:21:46.460
it the way you're using it, which is really the

00:21:46.460 --> 00:21:49.480
right way to use it, which is as an interactive

00:21:49.480 --> 00:21:54.119
partner and not as the final say of whatever

00:21:54.119 --> 00:21:58.910
it is you're trying to do. And so I would say

00:21:58.910 --> 00:22:02.450
my other suggestion to business owners could

00:22:02.450 --> 00:22:05.049
be to do exactly what you're doing, which is

00:22:05.049 --> 00:22:08.309
great, which is to not think of it as an Oracle

00:22:08.309 --> 00:22:11.609
that's gonna give you a final answer, but rather

00:22:11.609 --> 00:22:14.869
think of it as a thinking partner that you can

00:22:14.869 --> 00:22:17.490
bounce ideas off of. And maybe it will come up

00:22:17.490 --> 00:22:19.210
with new ideas that you haven't come up with,

00:22:19.210 --> 00:22:23.420
but you still need to. evaluate and decide if

00:22:23.420 --> 00:22:25.799
those ideas are actually as good as it seems

00:22:25.799 --> 00:22:28.339
to think they are. So that's the direction I'd

00:22:28.339 --> 00:22:31.779
like to see people leading into. What do you

00:22:31.779 --> 00:22:35.420
say when people, you know, they use AI and I've

00:22:35.420 --> 00:22:38.579
seen headlines in media where they're talking

00:22:38.579 --> 00:22:40.740
about like the loss of jobs and things of that

00:22:40.740 --> 00:22:44.539
nature and seems more of a scare tactic than

00:22:44.539 --> 00:22:50.960
an educational piece of information. Well, When

00:22:50.960 --> 00:22:54.660
you have any new technology, historically speaking,

00:22:55.180 --> 00:22:57.740
what's happened is there's been a loss of jobs,

00:22:57.980 --> 00:23:00.319
but there hasn't been a loss of employment because

00:23:00.319 --> 00:23:04.380
what happens is that the new technology shifts

00:23:04.380 --> 00:23:06.799
and creates all sorts of new work for people

00:23:06.799 --> 00:23:09.839
to do that didn't exist before. And very often

00:23:09.839 --> 00:23:11.640
that work is actually a lot more interesting

00:23:11.640 --> 00:23:14.079
than what people were doing before. So at one

00:23:14.079 --> 00:23:17.450
time you had rooms full of people with those

00:23:17.450 --> 00:23:20.589
electronic calculators doing banking business,

00:23:20.609 --> 00:23:23.529
for example, and putting things in folders and

00:23:23.529 --> 00:23:26.970
in filing cabinets. And then when the computer

00:23:26.970 --> 00:23:29.490
came along and all of that became automated,

00:23:30.289 --> 00:23:32.630
those people didn't have a job anymore, but they

00:23:32.630 --> 00:23:35.910
were still able to do, you know, to be supervising

00:23:35.910 --> 00:23:38.890
the computers or supervising the work of the

00:23:38.890 --> 00:23:41.529
bank in some way or another, or often different

00:23:41.529 --> 00:23:45.960
jobs. And so far, every single technological

00:23:45.960 --> 00:23:50.720
advancement has actually led to an increase in

00:23:50.720 --> 00:23:53.859
employment overall. Now, I mean, admittedly,

00:23:53.859 --> 00:23:56.660
there's disruption because people need to learn

00:23:56.660 --> 00:24:02.579
new skills. They may need to retool. Sometimes

00:24:02.579 --> 00:24:04.880
if someone's been in the workforce for a while,

00:24:05.180 --> 00:24:07.579
they may be so used to doing what they're doing

00:24:07.579 --> 00:24:10.180
that it's a burden for them to learn this set

00:24:10.180 --> 00:24:13.559
of new skills. So I'm not saying that it's without

00:24:13.599 --> 00:24:16.079
some degree of cost, but I don't think there's

00:24:16.079 --> 00:24:21.099
a risk of AI taking over and nobody having any

00:24:21.099 --> 00:24:23.339
work anymore and everyone being out of a job

00:24:23.339 --> 00:24:25.579
because again, there's always going to be some

00:24:25.579 --> 00:24:30.380
things that can't do that humans do better. So

00:24:30.380 --> 00:24:36.799
with the greater industries, I know that there's

00:24:36.799 --> 00:24:38.940
been a disruption, let's say people who design

00:24:38.940 --> 00:24:41.099
flyers and stuff like that, because a lot of

00:24:41.099 --> 00:24:44.259
times they have to design flyers. And then they

00:24:44.259 --> 00:24:49.019
say that photography and videography work, I

00:24:49.019 --> 00:24:51.460
don't necessarily believe that because I don't

00:24:51.460 --> 00:24:53.759
see any AI walking around here actually shooting

00:24:53.759 --> 00:24:57.680
stuff. And regardless of how much people shoot

00:24:57.680 --> 00:25:00.759
and upload, everyone's eye is just different.

00:25:00.839 --> 00:25:02.400
You're going to capture something different.

00:25:02.980 --> 00:25:05.299
What do you say to people like that as far as

00:25:05.299 --> 00:25:07.819
it disrupting those industries and they feeling

00:25:07.819 --> 00:25:11.940
that within X amount of years, AI can... either

00:25:11.940 --> 00:25:16.420
take over or substantially cut those jobs out.

00:25:17.599 --> 00:25:19.240
I mean, I think it's a very good possibility,

00:25:19.240 --> 00:25:22.660
again, that there are certain job categories.

00:25:23.140 --> 00:25:24.859
You know, if you're talking about flyers being

00:25:24.859 --> 00:25:28.420
handed out, I mean, already we have the Internet,

00:25:28.579 --> 00:25:31.720
which has made using the mail and putting flyers

00:25:31.720 --> 00:25:34.859
in the mail obsolete for many, many years now

00:25:34.859 --> 00:25:37.940
and has. But again, let's take a look at what

00:25:37.940 --> 00:25:42.819
happened. So. department stores and catalog sales

00:25:42.819 --> 00:25:46.960
suffered. But what you have now is this huge

00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:52.619
online booming internet economy. And there's

00:25:52.619 --> 00:25:57.640
lots of jobs there. And so what you have is not

00:25:57.759 --> 00:25:59.839
that people aren't buying anything anymore. It's

00:25:59.839 --> 00:26:02.380
just that they're buying it in a different way.

00:26:02.599 --> 00:26:04.359
And I think that that will be true for a lot

00:26:04.359 --> 00:26:06.619
of these things. They may not be consuming items

00:26:06.619 --> 00:26:09.099
in the same way. The items may be produced differently.

00:26:09.700 --> 00:26:12.539
Some of them may be, in fact, produced by AI.

00:26:13.019 --> 00:26:15.740
But then, you know, let's say the photographer,

00:26:15.940 --> 00:26:20.019
for example, that's going to free that photographer

00:26:20.019 --> 00:26:23.819
up to do other probably more creative work than

00:26:23.819 --> 00:26:25.839
what they were doing. And I think that's a net

00:26:25.839 --> 00:26:29.880
positive. So someone who is just taking pictures

00:26:29.880 --> 00:26:32.579
of oranges, and now you don't need to do that

00:26:32.579 --> 00:26:35.400
because if you want to advertise oranges, you

00:26:35.400 --> 00:26:38.000
just have AI generate a picture of an orange.

00:26:38.460 --> 00:26:41.220
Well, those people may be out of a job taking

00:26:41.220 --> 00:26:44.380
those pictures, but there's a whole range of

00:26:44.380 --> 00:26:47.660
creative opportunities that they can get into

00:26:47.660 --> 00:26:50.200
that AI is not going to immediately replace.

00:26:50.599 --> 00:26:53.440
And I think that's going to be much more the

00:26:53.440 --> 00:26:57.839
pattern. of what you see with AI than everybody

00:26:57.839 --> 00:27:03.200
being thrown out of work. But with it increasing

00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:06.039
efficiency, like you said, you're able to do

00:27:06.039 --> 00:27:09.019
work that would normally take longer, maybe days

00:27:09.019 --> 00:27:12.519
at a time. You can pack it into two hours. Oh,

00:27:12.559 --> 00:27:17.160
absolutely. Do you think that employers or just

00:27:17.160 --> 00:27:21.799
industries in general will require more productivity?

00:27:23.230 --> 00:27:25.329
I think they will. And I think that's happening

00:27:25.329 --> 00:27:29.569
already. But productivity gains because of technology

00:27:29.569 --> 00:27:31.950
are not anything new. I mean, if you think about,

00:27:32.089 --> 00:27:36.190
again, back to those people with the hand calculators

00:27:36.190 --> 00:27:40.970
in the back room of the bank grinding away, once

00:27:40.970 --> 00:27:44.670
you got computers in the picture there, the productivity

00:27:44.670 --> 00:27:50.269
per individual went up amazingly high because

00:27:50.269 --> 00:27:53.519
you didn't have to have the bottleneck of an

00:27:53.519 --> 00:27:56.220
individual grinding through a column of numbers

00:27:56.220 --> 00:28:01.400
for a period of time. So I think that the question

00:28:01.400 --> 00:28:04.859
is going to be sort of where do those productivity

00:28:04.859 --> 00:28:10.400
gains get, who benefits from them? So if you

00:28:10.400 --> 00:28:15.920
get a person who suddenly is 10x more productive,

00:28:16.579 --> 00:28:19.539
is that going to be reflected in their paycheck?

00:28:19.700 --> 00:28:21.980
Is that going to be reflected in some other aspect

00:28:21.980 --> 00:28:24.819
of their compensation? Or are they just going

00:28:24.819 --> 00:28:27.660
to be expected to continue working as hard as

00:28:27.660 --> 00:28:30.460
they've been doing at the same salary? And that's

00:28:30.460 --> 00:28:32.420
a discussion I think that we need to have because

00:28:32.420 --> 00:28:34.779
I think there is something to be said for there

00:28:34.779 --> 00:28:41.200
being a sort of technology dividend. So in other

00:28:41.200 --> 00:28:45.940
words, that all of us should benefit somehow.

00:28:46.250 --> 00:28:49.769
from this new technology, as opposed to just

00:28:49.769 --> 00:28:52.430
the people at the very top running the companies.

00:28:52.990 --> 00:28:55.490
And what that benefit should be, I don't know.

00:28:56.109 --> 00:28:59.049
But there should be some way. And this was something

00:28:59.049 --> 00:29:01.069
that was very big in the 50s that unfortunately

00:29:01.069 --> 00:29:04.230
never really came to pass. I mean, in the 50s,

00:29:04.329 --> 00:29:06.529
automation, we were all going to be pressing

00:29:06.529 --> 00:29:08.869
a button and cooking dinner. And so we would

00:29:08.869 --> 00:29:12.089
all be out playing tennis or golf or swimming.

00:29:12.089 --> 00:29:14.589
And then, you know, we come in from our two hour

00:29:14.589 --> 00:29:18.250
work week, like in the Jetsons. And that never

00:29:18.250 --> 00:29:21.390
really came to pass for a variety of reasons.

00:29:21.470 --> 00:29:26.150
But I think that's much more that's less a technology

00:29:26.150 --> 00:29:29.750
issue and more a social issue. So that's more

00:29:29.750 --> 00:29:34.059
about how do we want to choose? to allocate those

00:29:34.059 --> 00:29:36.920
resources that we've subtly freed up by having

00:29:36.920 --> 00:29:40.460
all of this work done by machines. And, you know,

00:29:40.519 --> 00:29:42.720
for example, right now, I mean, a big question

00:29:42.720 --> 00:29:46.940
is happening with Amazon drivers. They're considered

00:29:46.940 --> 00:29:51.640
to be basically not full time employees, but

00:29:51.640 --> 00:29:56.309
contractors. And there's a foot to. Make it so

00:29:56.309 --> 00:29:58.069
that they're treated as full -time employees

00:29:58.069 --> 00:30:00.309
of Amazon just like anyone else working Amazon

00:30:00.309 --> 00:30:04.470
which would increase their benefits so that's

00:30:04.470 --> 00:30:06.309
the kind of and you know, of course Amazon's

00:30:06.309 --> 00:30:07.750
against that they don't want to pay the money

00:30:07.750 --> 00:30:12.250
but That's the kind of tension. I think that's

00:30:12.250 --> 00:30:14.750
gonna have to be resolved and we're gonna kind

00:30:14.750 --> 00:30:18.490
of have to have a National coming -together moment

00:30:18.490 --> 00:30:23.309
to figure out how to equitably divide up this

00:30:23.309 --> 00:30:25.549
dividend so it's not just all going to a bunch

00:30:25.549 --> 00:30:28.670
of people at the top. I definitely agree with

00:30:28.670 --> 00:30:30.650
that because I think a lot of people at the top

00:30:30.650 --> 00:30:33.470
didn't get enough anyway. So why not share the

00:30:33.470 --> 00:30:37.049
wealth? Yeah, they're getting a lot already and

00:30:37.049 --> 00:30:39.650
the problem is that the system is kind of set

00:30:39.650 --> 00:30:46.309
up to allow them to continue that. process of

00:30:46.309 --> 00:30:49.470
getting a lot and getting more. And I don't know

00:30:49.470 --> 00:30:52.809
what kind of downward pressure is going to come

00:30:52.809 --> 00:30:57.529
about to make it so that there's more of a general

00:30:57.529 --> 00:31:00.529
distribution. When I'm not talking about a redistribution

00:31:00.529 --> 00:31:02.930
of wealth, I'm just talking about if a company

00:31:02.930 --> 00:31:06.690
is able to perform 10X better, then that should,

00:31:06.690 --> 00:31:08.930
I think, be reflected. Now, maybe you make the

00:31:08.930 --> 00:31:10.690
employees stockholders or something like that.

00:31:10.690 --> 00:31:12.650
And so then the value of their stock goes up.

00:31:13.369 --> 00:31:16.890
I don't know what the solution is, but I think

00:31:16.890 --> 00:31:20.549
that there definitely needs to be a way to make

00:31:20.549 --> 00:31:25.650
sure that this sudden boost in productive capability

00:31:25.650 --> 00:31:29.490
is spread more evenly than it seems to be right

00:31:29.490 --> 00:31:33.829
now. To me, that's just basic fairness. Yeah,

00:31:33.829 --> 00:31:38.049
which I definitely agree with it. I have a question.

00:31:38.309 --> 00:31:43.279
I was looking at a different interview and Yeah,

00:31:43.279 --> 00:31:45.700
we're talking about, I believe, like the European

00:31:45.700 --> 00:31:50.859
Union in 2027 is going to form compliance with

00:31:50.859 --> 00:31:56.359
AI. Yes. Yes. My question is, well, it could

00:31:56.359 --> 00:31:59.160
be a two part question. One, in doing something

00:31:59.160 --> 00:32:03.720
like this, I don't know if they're doing this,

00:32:03.920 --> 00:32:07.680
are they looking to like experts like you to

00:32:07.680 --> 00:32:12.119
actually help draw the diplomacy of compliance?

00:32:12.480 --> 00:32:16.519
And then also, who gets to set the rules for

00:32:16.519 --> 00:32:20.140
compliance? Because if people are using AI, like

00:32:20.140 --> 00:32:23.480
you say, in just generality, the wrong way, or

00:32:23.480 --> 00:32:27.579
don't understand how sophisticated it is, how

00:32:27.579 --> 00:32:36.759
can a body of people decide its complicity? Right.

00:32:37.259 --> 00:32:40.859
Exactly. Well, The EU is actually already getting

00:32:40.859 --> 00:32:43.940
pretty involved in AI much more so than the United

00:32:43.940 --> 00:32:47.299
States. For one thing, they now require watermarking.

00:32:47.960 --> 00:32:51.000
So anytime you generate something using AI, there's

00:32:51.000 --> 00:32:54.140
sort of a hidden code in the way the words are

00:32:54.140 --> 00:32:56.740
arranged that doesn't affect the output, but

00:32:56.740 --> 00:32:59.000
that is supposed to be, at least supposedly,

00:32:59.720 --> 00:33:02.700
detectable as having come from AI. And that's

00:33:02.700 --> 00:33:05.279
something that comes from the EU. Now, what's

00:33:05.279 --> 00:33:09.509
coming up in 2027? Really, no one really knows

00:33:09.509 --> 00:33:13.029
what's going to happen. This is a group of politicians

00:33:13.029 --> 00:33:15.769
and probably some European technologists, but

00:33:15.769 --> 00:33:20.230
AI does not really have the strong presence in

00:33:20.230 --> 00:33:22.609
Europe that it does in the United States. So

00:33:22.609 --> 00:33:25.170
I'm not sure where they're getting their technologists

00:33:25.170 --> 00:33:29.240
from. But right now, a lot of what's happening

00:33:29.240 --> 00:33:32.140
is that a lot of companies kind of know that

00:33:32.140 --> 00:33:33.880
sometime next year, they're going to have to

00:33:33.880 --> 00:33:37.259
start complying if they want to work in the EU.

00:33:37.940 --> 00:33:41.380
But everything is really up in the air as far

00:33:41.380 --> 00:33:43.960
as what exactly that is going to mean. I mean,

00:33:44.039 --> 00:33:47.140
is it going to mean having a third party that

00:33:47.140 --> 00:33:50.220
goes through a checklist of things to make sure

00:33:50.220 --> 00:33:53.180
that the AI that you're using has proper guardrails

00:33:53.180 --> 00:33:55.940
and a safe and that they actually certify that

00:33:55.940 --> 00:33:58.180
and you know they sign their names to it kind

00:33:58.180 --> 00:34:01.000
of like a banking examiner or is it going to

00:34:01.000 --> 00:34:04.759
mean something different and at this point we

00:34:04.759 --> 00:34:07.380
really don't know I wouldn't be hugely surprised

00:34:07.380 --> 00:34:10.179
if it doesn't get kicked down the road you know

00:34:10.179 --> 00:34:14.690
to 2028 or 2029 because It's such a complicated

00:34:14.690 --> 00:34:18.550
issue and there's so many stakeholders involved

00:34:18.550 --> 00:34:23.090
that it's kind of a little hard to imagine that

00:34:23.090 --> 00:34:27.530
it's going to become completely resolved within

00:34:27.530 --> 00:34:29.909
the next year. And you know, in this country

00:34:29.909 --> 00:34:32.269
as well, there's a lot of calls and I don't know

00:34:32.269 --> 00:34:33.789
how successful these are going to be. There are

00:34:33.789 --> 00:34:38.809
a lot of calls to put moratoriums on both the

00:34:38.809 --> 00:34:41.670
building out of new data centers because those

00:34:41.670 --> 00:34:43.670
are obviously very controversial. They use a

00:34:43.670 --> 00:34:47.630
lot of power. They use a lot of water. And also

00:34:47.630 --> 00:34:51.929
just on AI development in general. And I'm not

00:34:51.929 --> 00:34:56.010
sure how a national moratorium on AI development

00:34:56.010 --> 00:34:58.769
would even work because you can't stop individual

00:34:58.769 --> 00:35:01.829
researchers from continuing to do their work.

00:35:02.489 --> 00:35:04.769
I don't know what you would have inspectors go

00:35:04.769 --> 00:35:08.170
into open AI labs or Claude's labs and make sure

00:35:08.170 --> 00:35:10.940
they're not doing any they're not up to anything.

00:35:11.400 --> 00:35:14.420
And then you have China. And there's no reason

00:35:14.420 --> 00:35:17.599
that China is going to sign on to that kind of

00:35:17.599 --> 00:35:20.840
an agreement as well. Because they're doing really

00:35:20.840 --> 00:35:23.500
well with, you know, they're definitely in the

00:35:23.500 --> 00:35:25.500
running in the AI race, and they're producing

00:35:25.500 --> 00:35:29.679
a lot of very valuable, open models, which a

00:35:29.679 --> 00:35:34.480
lot of American companies aren't. And so I think

00:35:34.480 --> 00:35:37.480
the whole field right now, it's really very much

00:35:37.849 --> 00:35:41.590
a wild west. We don't really know where all of

00:35:41.590 --> 00:35:44.329
the dust is going to settle. It's kind of like

00:35:44.329 --> 00:35:48.489
the very early days of the web and the internet

00:35:48.489 --> 00:35:53.250
when the idea of using the web to advertise was

00:35:53.250 --> 00:35:56.289
seen as just an awful, awful idea. And the first

00:35:56.289 --> 00:35:59.030
person that did it got a lot of criticism. And

00:35:59.030 --> 00:36:02.030
of course now, I mean, that seems ridiculous.

00:36:02.329 --> 00:36:04.050
Yes, certain engines were controversial because

00:36:04.050 --> 00:36:07.289
of privacy concerns. All of these things, looking

00:36:07.289 --> 00:36:08.789
back on them, and I think we're going to find

00:36:08.789 --> 00:36:11.909
that a lot of probably it's going to be more

00:36:11.909 --> 00:36:13.929
laissez -faire and a lot of the things that we

00:36:13.929 --> 00:36:16.929
worry about now, we'll look back at and say,

00:36:16.969 --> 00:36:19.929
God, what were we even thinking about? Because

00:36:19.929 --> 00:36:23.250
look at how far we've come just in terms of like

00:36:23.250 --> 00:36:27.610
social media didn't exist a little over 20 years

00:36:27.610 --> 00:36:34.730
ago. And it's become so fully integrated into

00:36:34.920 --> 00:36:38.880
our lives. And there are certainly very strong

00:36:38.880 --> 00:36:41.519
arguments to be made for regulating it, but that

00:36:41.519 --> 00:36:43.480
never really came to pass. And now it's kind

00:36:43.480 --> 00:36:46.239
of too late. I mean, there's really no clear

00:36:46.239 --> 00:36:50.400
set of steps that you could put into play to

00:36:50.400 --> 00:36:53.739
regulate social media. So we're kind of for good

00:36:53.739 --> 00:36:56.920
or bad stuck with it the way it is. So I think

00:36:56.920 --> 00:37:00.690
it's probably going to be less something planned

00:37:00.690 --> 00:37:03.190
out and more sort of a whole bunch of different

00:37:03.190 --> 00:37:06.889
little ad hoc things come together. And we figure

00:37:06.889 --> 00:37:11.170
out some sort of compromise, but probably no

00:37:11.170 --> 00:37:13.070
one is going to be happy because no one ever

00:37:13.070 --> 00:37:18.630
is happy with a good compromise. This is amazing.

00:37:19.989 --> 00:37:23.829
So I want you to explain a little bit of the

00:37:23.829 --> 00:37:27.719
complexity. of AI because most people just think

00:37:27.719 --> 00:37:30.380
of it like as a computer. You go and put information

00:37:30.380 --> 00:37:34.360
in and it researches and spits out information.

00:37:35.099 --> 00:37:38.159
And one thing I came across, I believe you was

00:37:38.159 --> 00:37:41.860
given an example of I think a 1958 experiment

00:37:41.860 --> 00:37:45.059
where they were talking to kids and made up a

00:37:45.059 --> 00:37:49.000
word. And then that particular word, because

00:37:49.000 --> 00:37:51.519
they said there were two of them, the kids naturally

00:37:51.519 --> 00:37:55.889
pluralized it. the language in how that relates

00:37:55.889 --> 00:38:00.690
to AI in the way that it arrives at its decision.

00:38:01.949 --> 00:38:08.150
Well, so that's out of a sort of area of more

00:38:08.150 --> 00:38:11.409
psycholinguistic, psychological, cognitive psychology

00:38:11.409 --> 00:38:14.550
research. And that basically is an area that

00:38:14.550 --> 00:38:16.869
I'm interested in, which has to do with trying

00:38:16.869 --> 00:38:21.539
to figure out to what extent these computer models

00:38:21.539 --> 00:38:25.199
are similar to humans when they use language.

00:38:25.340 --> 00:38:27.800
And there's a lot of ways in which they're completely

00:38:27.800 --> 00:38:31.380
not like humans at all. And I think that's an

00:38:31.380 --> 00:38:33.179
important thing to keep in mind because people

00:38:33.179 --> 00:38:35.840
think that they're alive, they're human, they're

00:38:35.840 --> 00:38:40.000
talking to them. But if you break down what they're

00:38:40.000 --> 00:38:44.260
doing, in some ways, it's incredibly simple compared

00:38:44.260 --> 00:38:48.099
to how humans process information and process

00:38:48.099 --> 00:38:51.030
language. point that I always think is just fascinating

00:38:51.030 --> 00:38:55.449
is when you look at the amount of energy that

00:38:55.449 --> 00:38:59.690
a human brain needs, it's like a light bulb or

00:38:59.690 --> 00:39:03.710
something tiny like that, compared to the huge

00:39:03.710 --> 00:39:07.150
amounts of energy that one of these queries requires

00:39:07.150 --> 00:39:10.590
in order to process. So right there, that tells

00:39:10.590 --> 00:39:14.190
us that something's not the same about these

00:39:14.190 --> 00:39:17.469
two processes, because whatever we're doing can

00:39:17.469 --> 00:39:22.489
be done with much less energy consumption than

00:39:22.489 --> 00:39:26.130
the method that we're using now for algorithms

00:39:26.130 --> 00:39:29.889
in the computer. To your point about the wugs,

00:39:30.369 --> 00:39:32.809
what you were talking about is that way back

00:39:32.809 --> 00:39:36.909
in the day, they wanted to see how children acquired

00:39:36.909 --> 00:39:42.889
rules like the plural is a dash S. You would

00:39:42.889 --> 00:39:46.510
give someone, a kid, a new like a made -up word,

00:39:46.639 --> 00:39:51.559
a wug and you would say, here's two of them,

00:39:51.599 --> 00:39:53.360
what do you have? And they would say two wugs.

00:39:53.920 --> 00:39:57.679
And the idea of that was that they had generalized

00:39:57.679 --> 00:40:04.039
a rule that to make a plural, you add an S to

00:40:04.039 --> 00:40:08.119
a word. And the point is that that rule applied

00:40:08.119 --> 00:40:11.599
to things that you had never seen before. And

00:40:11.599 --> 00:40:15.860
that kind of is the basis for a lot of linguistic

00:40:15.860 --> 00:40:19.119
theory because you obviously have to have some

00:40:19.119 --> 00:40:23.079
system that lets you introduce new words into

00:40:23.079 --> 00:40:25.739
the child's vocabulary and not have them be completely

00:40:25.739 --> 00:40:29.639
confused. And the same was done, there was a

00:40:29.639 --> 00:40:32.579
lot of work done with the past tense as well.

00:40:33.000 --> 00:40:34.739
And what you see in children is very interesting.

00:40:34.800 --> 00:40:37.940
What you see in children is that they learn the

00:40:37.940 --> 00:40:45.079
irregular past tense like went quite But then

00:40:45.079 --> 00:40:49.619
they use the, when they learn the dash ED for

00:40:49.619 --> 00:40:51.960
the regular, sometimes they over -correct and

00:40:51.960 --> 00:40:55.440
they start saying goat. And then they go and

00:40:55.440 --> 00:40:59.260
say, went again. And I actually, many people

00:40:59.260 --> 00:41:01.219
have run these experiments and I've run them

00:41:01.219 --> 00:41:07.559
myself. I wanted to see, did the machine show

00:41:07.559 --> 00:41:11.260
the same kind of rule -based learning? that humans

00:41:11.260 --> 00:41:14.880
seem to have. And it doesn't. It actually does

00:41:14.880 --> 00:41:18.500
not show the same pattern at all. And what happens

00:41:18.500 --> 00:41:25.460
is that it kind of learns that a dash ed is what

00:41:25.460 --> 00:41:28.260
you put at the end of a past tense when you have

00:41:28.260 --> 00:41:30.559
a new word. But it doesn't always learn that

00:41:30.559 --> 00:41:34.179
the way children do. And a lot of it has to do

00:41:34.179 --> 00:41:38.449
with just how frequent the input is. to the system.

00:41:38.750 --> 00:41:41.530
So it has lots of goes and whens and whens and

00:41:41.530 --> 00:41:45.969
goes, then it learns that very well. And whether

00:41:45.969 --> 00:41:50.030
or not it's really learning a rule, or it's just

00:41:50.030 --> 00:41:53.730
learning because it heard this before, and it's

00:41:53.730 --> 00:41:55.650
general, it's not generalizing, but it's just

00:41:55.650 --> 00:41:58.590
using its own memory. So I think that's probably

00:41:58.590 --> 00:42:00.610
some of the experiments that you're talking about.

00:42:00.630 --> 00:42:04.750
And they're pretty central to the whole question

00:42:04.750 --> 00:42:07.809
of how how similar these systems are to human

00:42:07.809 --> 00:42:11.849
language processing, and the degree to which

00:42:11.849 --> 00:42:13.969
they can tell us something about human language

00:42:13.969 --> 00:42:21.429
processing. Love it. You have a podcast, which

00:42:21.429 --> 00:42:24.690
you do, when you're talking about the AI, the

00:42:24.690 --> 00:42:29.550
black box, if I'm not mistaken? Inside the black

00:42:29.550 --> 00:42:32.050
box. Inside the black box. Yeah, I have a substack,

00:42:32.050 --> 00:42:34.659
and I also just sort of put it into a podcast

00:42:34.659 --> 00:42:37.820
form as well. That's right. What made you want

00:42:37.820 --> 00:42:41.260
to use that method of delivery for the information

00:42:41.260 --> 00:42:44.559
until anybody who wants to learn more about it?

00:42:44.559 --> 00:42:47.480
What would they get out of it or they can expect

00:42:47.480 --> 00:42:51.039
to learn? Well, I've talked to people that read

00:42:51.039 --> 00:42:53.820
this or that listen to the podcast, and I think

00:42:53.820 --> 00:42:58.079
that there are a lot of people out there who

00:42:58.079 --> 00:43:02.780
are experts in their own fields. So doctors,

00:43:02.940 --> 00:43:06.360
lawyers, engineers, people like that and who

00:43:06.360 --> 00:43:11.239
are fascinated by AI but don't really understand

00:43:11.239 --> 00:43:14.300
much about the nuts and bolts of how it works.

00:43:14.900 --> 00:43:17.159
And so what I wanted to do and what I try to

00:43:17.159 --> 00:43:21.139
do is to pick a topic every week that's kind

00:43:21.139 --> 00:43:25.380
of a good explanation of some little aspect.

00:43:25.420 --> 00:43:27.679
So we were talking about the past tense that

00:43:27.679 --> 00:43:30.699
last week I posted some experiments that I had

00:43:30.699 --> 00:43:34.710
done. looking at learning of the past tense in

00:43:34.710 --> 00:43:37.429
AI systems and how that compares and contrasts

00:43:37.429 --> 00:43:40.110
what you see with kids and what that can tell

00:43:40.110 --> 00:43:42.849
you about what's going on inside those systems.

00:43:43.710 --> 00:43:47.750
So I think that in the end, people are really

00:43:47.750 --> 00:43:51.050
fascinated by these systems. But what surprises

00:43:51.050 --> 00:43:53.650
them and what I kind of focus on and inside the

00:43:53.650 --> 00:43:58.530
black box on Substack and the podcast is that

00:43:58.679 --> 00:44:02.760
even the people that created them do not fully

00:44:02.760 --> 00:44:05.820
understand how it is that they arrive at the

00:44:05.820 --> 00:44:09.360
solutions that they arrive at. And there's a

00:44:09.360 --> 00:44:12.340
whole field called mechanistic interpretability

00:44:12.340 --> 00:44:16.460
that aims to understand what's at, because, and

00:44:16.460 --> 00:44:18.719
the reason for that is simply that these systems

00:44:18.719 --> 00:44:22.300
have literally billions and billions of parameters.

00:44:22.460 --> 00:44:27.269
I mean, they have huge numbers of numbers, really

00:44:27.269 --> 00:44:31.230
large vectors being processed by these chips,

00:44:31.650 --> 00:44:37.090
by these GPUs. And so when you have a solution

00:44:37.090 --> 00:44:41.630
space that's that large, it's very difficult,

00:44:41.829 --> 00:44:44.250
unless everything is crisp and rule -based, which

00:44:44.250 --> 00:44:47.090
we don't think it is, it's very difficult to

00:44:47.090 --> 00:44:50.389
figure out exactly how it's learning because

00:44:50.389 --> 00:44:54.469
what these systems do is you give them the answer

00:44:54.760 --> 00:44:57.440
And then you see if they come up with the answer.

00:44:57.519 --> 00:44:59.440
And then if they don't, you adjust them a little

00:44:59.440 --> 00:45:03.119
bit and you just keep doing that repeatedly for

00:45:03.119 --> 00:45:06.199
literally trillions, sometimes trillions of iterations

00:45:06.199 --> 00:45:09.260
until when you put something in at the other

00:45:09.260 --> 00:45:12.420
end, you get something out and it makes sense.

00:45:12.780 --> 00:45:15.079
But what's going on in that in between with all

00:45:15.079 --> 00:45:18.739
those numbers is extremely complicated and very

00:45:18.739 --> 00:45:26.030
difficult to really fathom, I think. And so what

00:45:26.030 --> 00:45:28.969
I do in Inside the Black Box is try to talk a

00:45:28.969 --> 00:45:31.309
little bit about, you know, different topics

00:45:31.309 --> 00:45:34.289
in there and maybe make it a little bit less

00:45:34.289 --> 00:45:37.730
mysterious for people and a little less scary.

00:45:38.889 --> 00:45:44.250
I love it. So for everybody out there, they want

00:45:44.250 --> 00:45:47.909
to learn more. Where would you like them to go?

00:45:48.210 --> 00:45:53.079
And then also What's the number one misnomer

00:45:53.079 --> 00:45:58.719
that people have about AI? Well, so you can see

00:45:58.719 --> 00:46:02.400
the substack is inside the black box .ai. I also

00:46:02.400 --> 00:46:06.280
have an app called your voicecraft .ai, which

00:46:06.280 --> 00:46:08.280
you can go to and get a beta for and that will

00:46:08.280 --> 00:46:13.539
allow you to basically train a local model like

00:46:13.539 --> 00:46:15.500
what we were talking about to speak in your own

00:46:15.500 --> 00:46:21.460
voice and your written voice. As far as the things

00:46:21.460 --> 00:46:25.920
that I see people wrong about, I guess you could

00:46:25.920 --> 00:46:28.860
say about AI, I think it's not something to be

00:46:28.860 --> 00:46:31.840
scared of. There's a lot of very anti -AI sentiment,

00:46:32.719 --> 00:46:36.599
and I live in a kind of bubble where everyone

00:46:36.599 --> 00:46:38.380
thinks AI is great, and I have to keep reminding

00:46:38.380 --> 00:46:40.000
myself that there are a lot of people out there

00:46:40.000 --> 00:46:42.920
that don't think that AI is great. They're afraid

00:46:42.920 --> 00:46:45.079
it'll take away their jobs, which is an issue

00:46:45.079 --> 00:46:48.590
we've already discussed. They're afraid that

00:46:48.590 --> 00:46:51.690
it will somehow take over the world, which is

00:46:51.690 --> 00:46:58.309
pretty unlikely. And there are people who think,

00:46:58.309 --> 00:46:59.829
I think, that they're actually, in some sense,

00:47:00.010 --> 00:47:03.510
alive. And it's an actual entity that you're

00:47:03.510 --> 00:47:08.090
talking to. And that's just not the case. You're

00:47:08.090 --> 00:47:10.610
dealing with a computer. It's all ones and zeros.

00:47:10.690 --> 00:47:13.469
You're putting information into a huge register

00:47:13.469 --> 00:47:16.400
or stack. of computing elements, and you're getting

00:47:16.400 --> 00:47:19.699
something out. That's nothing like what the human

00:47:19.699 --> 00:47:22.360
brain does. It's much more complicated. Neurons

00:47:22.360 --> 00:47:26.000
are just these completely mysterious computational

00:47:26.000 --> 00:47:29.219
elements that do a lot more than what a computer

00:47:29.219 --> 00:47:32.000
does, and with a lot less power, as we've discussed.

00:47:32.480 --> 00:47:34.940
So I would say, my takeaways are, don't be scared.

00:47:35.119 --> 00:47:39.139
Learn it. Actually get to know the strengths

00:47:39.139 --> 00:47:42.670
and weaknesses of it. when you go in and start

00:47:42.670 --> 00:47:45.130
playing with it and trying to get responses from

00:47:45.130 --> 00:47:47.969
it, you begin to get a sort of sense of its personality.

00:47:48.110 --> 00:47:49.929
I don't like to say personality, but I'll say

00:47:49.929 --> 00:47:53.389
personality because it's not a human, but it's

00:47:53.389 --> 00:47:56.849
sort of personality and the sorts of ways that

00:47:56.849 --> 00:47:59.789
it responds to the things that you say. And I

00:47:59.789 --> 00:48:03.090
think that helps to demystify it and make it

00:48:03.090 --> 00:48:06.349
a lot less scary for a lot of people. So that

00:48:06.349 --> 00:48:11.639
would be my take home. But Dr. Blackwell, I appreciate

00:48:11.639 --> 00:48:17.639
your time and you giving me inside perspective

00:48:17.639 --> 00:48:21.000
to this, which I've learned some more things

00:48:21.000 --> 00:48:25.059
today and just even how to just look at AI. And

00:48:25.059 --> 00:48:28.800
I'm glad that I've been prompting like pretty

00:48:28.800 --> 00:48:30.820
correctly. Yeah, I like your prompt. The way

00:48:30.820 --> 00:48:33.699
you've been prompting is very good. I mean, that's

00:48:33.699 --> 00:48:37.829
what I do. So I'm on the right path. I like that.

00:48:40.190 --> 00:48:42.590
Absolutely. Everybody out there, y 'all can go

00:48:42.590 --> 00:48:45.369
check out Inside the Black Box podcast. I have

00:48:45.369 --> 00:48:48.190
it all description and linked in the show. And

00:48:48.190 --> 00:48:50.829
then also you said you're on Substack as well.

00:48:51.750 --> 00:48:54.469
That the Inside the Black Box .ai is Substack.

00:48:54.530 --> 00:48:57.190
But if you do Inside the Black Box, you'll also

00:48:57.190 --> 00:48:59.409
if you do a podcast search, you'll find it as

00:48:59.409 --> 00:49:03.329
a podcast as well on Apple Spotify. and y 'all

00:49:03.329 --> 00:49:05.409
can go and check it out. If you want to learn

00:49:05.409 --> 00:49:08.909
more, you got questions, think of nature, get

00:49:08.909 --> 00:49:11.690
up Dr. Blackwell, I'm sure he would respond whenever

00:49:11.690 --> 00:49:14.570
he has free time. Yeah, absolutely. Substack

00:49:14.570 --> 00:49:17.429
actually has a mailing system, so you can DM

00:49:17.429 --> 00:49:19.869
me if you want. That's what's up. So you got

00:49:19.869 --> 00:49:22.610
a system in place for everything. Yeah, that's

00:49:22.610 --> 00:49:25.710
right. I try to. I love it. You're going to learn

00:49:25.710 --> 00:49:28.440
how to be more efficient out here using AI. I'm

00:49:28.440 --> 00:49:30.619
your host, Andreas. But think that radio show

00:49:30.619 --> 00:49:33.619
has been music and business talk in covering,

00:49:33.619 --> 00:49:36.679
you know, AI. When I started my first independent

00:49:36.679 --> 00:49:38.739
record label, I was folding shirts at Old Navy,

00:49:38.920 --> 00:49:41.099
slipping handmade compilation CDs, straight into

00:49:41.099 --> 00:49:43.500
customer shopping bags just to secure my first

00:49:43.500 --> 00:49:46.019
sales. I had zero budget, but I had an infinite

00:49:46.019 --> 00:49:49.579
drive. But today I see so many solopreneurs running

00:49:49.579 --> 00:49:52.280
on social media, treadmills, posting content

00:49:52.280 --> 00:49:55.320
for free and praying that algorithm smiles on

00:49:55.320 --> 00:49:57.969
them. That's not a business plan. That's hope

00:49:57.969 --> 00:49:59.969
marketing. If you don't pay to advertise and

00:49:59.969 --> 00:50:02.409
build search engine infrastructure, you are paying

00:50:02.409 --> 00:50:05.550
with your manual labor hours instead. Stop building

00:50:05.550 --> 00:50:08.409
on rented land. I put my entire 10 -year field

00:50:08.409 --> 00:50:11.710
manual on pay hip called I Can Do Bad All By

00:50:11.710 --> 00:50:15.210
Myself to show you exactly how to build a sovereign

00:50:15.210 --> 00:50:17.909
empire you own outright. Comment the word link

00:50:17.909 --> 00:50:20.070
below and I will instantly DM you the link to

00:50:20.070 --> 00:50:21.769
grab your copy for $19 .99.