Unmasking AI Hype: Truth Mode, Content Slop, & more Dr. Arshavir Blackwell | Bankedoutt Radio Show
E Book: https://payhip.com/b/YAFri
Episode Summary
In this high-velocity episode of Bankedoutt Radio Show, Media Producer and CEO Andreas Cooke sits down with 30-year artificial intelligence veteran and cognitive scientist Dr. Arshavir Blackwell. Moving completely past the generic corporate marketing hype, they pull back the curtain on how AI models actually compute language, the dangerous rise of automated "content slop," and how small business owners can install defensive systems to protect their authentic brand voice.
Whether you are looking to scale your local SEO, safely automate your operational bottlenecks, or understand the future of human productivity, Dr. Blackwell delivers a data-backed field manual for the modern entrepreneur.
⏱️ Jump Straight to the Insights: Time-Stamped Breakdown
01:10 — The Dual-Edged Sword: An honest look at the direct advantages and hidden disadvantages of modern AI tools in commercial spaces.
03:40 — Demystifying Local LLMs: What "Local Large Language Models" actually are, and why hosting an AI model on your own private hardware is a massive security win for your business. 10:54 — The Search Engine Edge: Advanced frameworks for using AI to radically speed up your local SEO strategy without getting penalized by search algorithms.
12:42 — Exposing "AI Slop": Breaking down the modern terminology of digital slop, specifically focusing on the deceptive rise of artificial food imagery in retail and restaurant marketing.
14:30 — The Information Verification Protocol: A step-by-step human verification process to safely audit, fact-check, and double-verify the data that AI platforms present to you.
19:00 — Activating "Truth Mode": How to force your artificial intelligence tools out of generic consensus mode and into high-integrity, data-driven "Truth Mode."
21:30 — The Shift in Perspective: How smart entrepreneurs must fundamentally reframe their mental model of AI to view it as a collaborative assistant rather than a human replacement.
25:00 — The Software Velocity Shift: A masterclass on the total transformation of business productivity and scaling workflows ahead of the market curve.
45:50 — What Everyone Gets Wrong: Dr. Blackwell drops a hard-hitting reality check on the single biggest misconception the general public harbors about artificial intelligence.
https://arshavir.jellypod.com/episodes/82bb94da-d929-4768-93fe-acbfcae1bf3e
Website https://arvoinen.ai/
Substack: https://arshavirblackwell.substack.com/
BRS: https://www.musicandbusinesstalk.com
Newsletter: https://www.musicandbusinesstalk.com/newsletter/
Sig up to get your podcast website streamlined https://www.musicandbusinesstalk.com/podpage
WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.800
Hey y 'all, welcome back to Bankedoutt Radio Show
00:00:01.800 --> 00:00:05.519
Music and Business Talk. Every single business
00:00:05.519 --> 00:00:08.460
owner is being bombarded with a tech marketing
00:00:08.460 --> 00:00:10.839
hype telling them to let AI run their company.
00:00:11.619 --> 00:00:14.880
But what happens when your brand loses its heartbeat?
00:00:15.759 --> 00:00:18.739
Our guest today has been building artificial
00:00:18.739 --> 00:00:22.300
intelligence since long before it became a trending
00:00:22.300 --> 00:00:26.559
buzzword. Dr. Arshavir Blackwell holds a PhD
00:00:26.559 --> 00:00:29.199
in cognitive science and brings over 30 years
00:00:29.199 --> 00:00:32.899
of raw frontline tech experience to the table.
00:00:33.539 --> 00:00:35.799
He is an elite strategist who helps creators
00:00:35.799 --> 00:00:38.640
and founders leverage advanced machine learning
00:00:38.640 --> 00:00:42.079
without losing their unique sovereign human voice.
00:00:43.060 --> 00:00:46.320
Dr. Blackwell, welcome to the platform. Thank
00:00:46.320 --> 00:00:50.759
you very much. It's great to be here. So there
00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:54.469
is a a couple of videos I was watching as in
00:00:54.469 --> 00:00:56.530
preparation for this interview that you did.
00:00:58.350 --> 00:01:01.490
And one of the things I wanted to get into is
00:01:01.490 --> 00:01:06.409
understanding like AI, how consumers use it.
00:01:06.689 --> 00:01:12.430
So like, you know, chat, GPT, little Gemini are
00:01:12.430 --> 00:01:16.269
from my understanding, like the frontier of AI.
00:01:17.290 --> 00:01:19.430
And then those are the frontier models. That's
00:01:19.430 --> 00:01:23.239
right. You also have what you call the local
00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:26.939
model. Yes. Which is running the application
00:01:26.939 --> 00:01:30.159
basically on your own particular device. Can
00:01:30.159 --> 00:01:33.280
you give us a little more brief explanation of
00:01:33.280 --> 00:01:38.180
what that is? Sure. So Frontier models are the
00:01:38.180 --> 00:01:40.980
ones that everybody probably, for the most part,
00:01:41.140 --> 00:01:46.640
is using. And those are things like Claude, JetGPT,
00:01:46.900 --> 00:01:51.439
Gemini, and so forth. those are all running in
00:01:51.439 --> 00:01:55.079
the cloud. And the advantages of them are they're
00:01:55.079 --> 00:01:58.459
very powerful, of course, as we all know. The
00:01:58.459 --> 00:02:01.540
disadvantages of them are amongst, well, first
00:02:01.540 --> 00:02:03.519
of all, they get to be expensive. If you use
00:02:03.519 --> 00:02:06.280
them a lot, you notice that you're burning through
00:02:06.280 --> 00:02:08.680
a lot of tokens, and that can add up very quickly.
00:02:09.719 --> 00:02:11.860
The other disadvantage, well, there's actually
00:02:11.860 --> 00:02:14.419
two other disadvantages. One is it's not secure.
00:02:14.650 --> 00:02:18.030
So you can't really expect that whatever you're
00:02:18.030 --> 00:02:23.030
going to send out over the wire is going to be
00:02:23.030 --> 00:02:26.150
preserved and secure and safe. They could very
00:02:26.150 --> 00:02:30.349
well use what you're sending them for training
00:02:30.349 --> 00:02:32.990
for their own material. And of course people
00:02:32.990 --> 00:02:35.370
can intercept along the way and there's other
00:02:35.370 --> 00:02:39.110
security concerns as well. The other thing that
00:02:39.110 --> 00:02:42.110
a frontier model cannot do is it can't really
00:02:42.110 --> 00:02:45.930
speak in your own voice. And the reason for that
00:02:45.930 --> 00:02:48.469
is because you can't really, they're trained
00:02:48.469 --> 00:02:51.689
already. They come pre -trained. When I work
00:02:51.689 --> 00:02:53.909
with a local business in Macon, Georgia, we took
00:02:53.909 --> 00:02:57.069
their operational revenue from 45K to 88K in
00:02:57.069 --> 00:02:59.849
a single year. How? We didn't chase social media
00:02:59.849 --> 00:03:02.870
clout. We found hidden billing programs, cut
00:03:02.870 --> 00:03:05.669
cash based operational leaks, and fixed their
00:03:05.669 --> 00:03:07.569
pricing structures. Most independent creators,
00:03:07.810 --> 00:03:09.849
bookkeepers, and estheticians are amazing at
00:03:09.849 --> 00:03:12.409
their craft, but they run their back ends like
00:03:12.409 --> 00:03:14.789
an expensive charity. They carry uncollected
00:03:14.789 --> 00:03:17.210
fees and think customers would just appear out
00:03:17.210 --> 00:03:19.370
of nowhere. Don't let operational blindness kill
00:03:19.370 --> 00:03:21.789
your vision. The worksheets inside my guy will
00:03:21.789 --> 00:03:24.449
help you audit your company structure in 48 hours.
00:03:24.569 --> 00:03:27.129
Grab your copy right now for $19 .99. Type here
00:03:27.129 --> 00:03:29.110
to buy the e -book. I mean, that's in the name,
00:03:29.169 --> 00:03:33.340
right? So because of that. There's really no
00:03:33.340 --> 00:03:35.680
way, there are no levers that you can use to
00:03:35.680 --> 00:03:38.719
really change what the nature of the output is,
00:03:39.340 --> 00:03:41.400
other than what you put in the prompt. And what
00:03:41.400 --> 00:03:43.860
we find is that the prompt is really not a very
00:03:43.860 --> 00:03:46.740
good way to do that. So you can give it instructions
00:03:46.740 --> 00:03:50.599
about what you want it to sound like in the prompt.
00:03:51.199 --> 00:03:54.280
But what happens very often is you get a costume.
00:03:54.780 --> 00:03:57.979
So you don't get genuine sounding, authentic
00:03:57.979 --> 00:04:02.110
changes. You get a sort of performative version
00:04:02.110 --> 00:04:04.590
where it just sounds very fake and it sounds
00:04:04.590 --> 00:04:08.289
like it's kind of trying to put on whatever tone
00:04:08.289 --> 00:04:10.770
you've asked it to do, but it really can't do
00:04:10.770 --> 00:04:13.689
that. Now what I work with are what are called
00:04:13.689 --> 00:04:17.290
local large language models, and they're local
00:04:17.290 --> 00:04:20.430
because you can run them either on your own computer
00:04:20.430 --> 00:04:24.110
or we run them also on a dedicated server, but
00:04:24.110 --> 00:04:26.129
one that's not connected to Frontier models,
00:04:26.209 --> 00:04:30.259
one that's not connected to chat GPT. And you
00:04:30.259 --> 00:04:34.860
can actually train those on your own material.
00:04:35.899 --> 00:04:40.180
And those are not in their responses performative.
00:04:40.519 --> 00:04:42.720
Because when you train it on your own material,
00:04:43.060 --> 00:04:45.459
you're not training it through the prompt. You're
00:04:45.459 --> 00:04:48.860
actually changing the nature of the learning
00:04:48.860 --> 00:04:52.660
in the model. And so what we do is we can actually
00:04:52.660 --> 00:04:56.040
have it read. Let's say you have a blog or a
00:04:56.040 --> 00:04:59.800
substack or a bunch of marketing material. it
00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:02.620
actually reads through all of that and retrains
00:05:02.620 --> 00:05:08.579
itself to speak in your voice. And the advantage
00:05:08.579 --> 00:05:10.680
of that is that you don't have to spend a lot
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:14.819
of time on chat GPT or on cloud having it write
00:05:14.819 --> 00:05:16.540
something and then having you have to rewrite
00:05:16.540 --> 00:05:19.120
it. I mean, it kind of misses the whole point
00:05:19.120 --> 00:05:22.019
when you have to do that. So that's basically
00:05:22.019 --> 00:05:24.720
what we're working with here is a local model
00:05:24.720 --> 00:05:27.560
that's safe. It's much cheaper because you're
00:05:27.560 --> 00:05:30.560
not burning up tokens on some huge frontier model.
00:05:31.100 --> 00:05:34.860
And it's trained on your own voice. So it sounds
00:05:34.860 --> 00:05:38.439
like you. How long would it take to be able to
00:05:38.439 --> 00:05:42.199
do that, to train your own voice? How much material
00:05:42.199 --> 00:05:47.060
would you have to input into it? Yeah. So the
00:05:47.060 --> 00:05:49.720
training time is maybe 10 minutes, 15 minutes
00:05:49.720 --> 00:05:53.560
max. It's not very long. And you only have to
00:05:53.560 --> 00:05:55.560
do that the first time you use it. And then after
00:05:55.560 --> 00:05:58.920
that, it's already trained. The more information
00:05:58.920 --> 00:06:01.720
it has, so let's say you have a large size blog,
00:06:01.920 --> 00:06:05.519
it would certainly be enough. If you have a lot
00:06:05.519 --> 00:06:08.540
of emails that you've written, so they're all
00:06:08.540 --> 00:06:11.420
in your own voice, that would be enough. With
00:06:11.420 --> 00:06:14.920
mine, I train it on about... oh, 50 ,000 words
00:06:14.920 --> 00:06:17.259
and it does pretty well. And that would be kind
00:06:17.259 --> 00:06:20.379
of, that's not huge, but that's kind of the size
00:06:20.379 --> 00:06:24.519
of maybe a medium sized blog or mixed in there
00:06:24.519 --> 00:06:27.300
with perhaps marketing documents that you've
00:06:27.300 --> 00:06:29.839
got or some other material. So it doesn't have
00:06:29.839 --> 00:06:31.620
to be just one thing. Now, if you want it to
00:06:31.620 --> 00:06:34.000
be in a particular style, everything that's written
00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:37.040
in it. So if you're doing marketing for a certain
00:06:37.040 --> 00:06:40.360
product, you shouldn't mix it in with your blog
00:06:40.360 --> 00:06:42.800
about cooking. or something like that. Those
00:06:42.800 --> 00:06:46.980
should be two separate ones. But you can actually
00:06:46.980 --> 00:06:51.360
get a pretty good result with a relatively small
00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:53.860
amount of information trained relatively quickly.
00:06:57.420 --> 00:07:00.939
So, Dears, you've been in this space for 30 years.
00:07:01.139 --> 00:07:04.240
Yeah. How are people using it wrong nowadays,
00:07:04.339 --> 00:07:06.699
especially when it comes to small business owners?
00:07:08.040 --> 00:07:11.139
Well, I've been doing this since before it was
00:07:11.139 --> 00:07:13.699
called AI back when I first started doing it.
00:07:13.839 --> 00:07:16.120
We called it neural networks. And that's essentially
00:07:16.120 --> 00:07:18.800
what we're calling AI now is basically just a
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:23.600
very, very sophisticated neural network. I started
00:07:23.600 --> 00:07:26.740
at UCSD and I was very, very fortunate to work
00:07:26.740 --> 00:07:29.480
with two of the pioneers in the field of neural
00:07:29.480 --> 00:07:31.660
networks. Elizabeth Bates, who was a linguist
00:07:31.660 --> 00:07:34.180
who did a lot of work in understanding out humans
00:07:34.180 --> 00:07:36.699
process language, but how neural network could
00:07:36.699 --> 00:07:39.660
do it as well. And then her colleague, Jeff Elman,
00:07:39.839 --> 00:07:42.899
who was also someone who did a lot of the real
00:07:42.899 --> 00:07:46.379
pioneering works with neural networks and artificial
00:07:46.379 --> 00:07:50.720
intelligence. What was happening back then that's
00:07:50.720 --> 00:07:53.459
contrasted with now and what it's really changed
00:07:53.459 --> 00:08:00.180
is the models were much smaller and the designs
00:08:00.180 --> 00:08:03.459
for the models were small but also the computers
00:08:03.459 --> 00:08:07.939
that we were running them on were you know much
00:08:07.939 --> 00:08:11.160
less powerful than these huge data centers that
00:08:11.160 --> 00:08:13.680
we have access to today. I mean orders and orders
00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:16.980
of magnitude difference. So what happened was
00:08:16.980 --> 00:08:20.839
about oh you know maybe four or five years ago
00:08:21.259 --> 00:08:25.459
there was a sort of revolution that came about
00:08:25.459 --> 00:08:30.000
as a confluence of new algorithms, more powerful
00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:35.779
kinds of computers to run them on, parallel algorithms,
00:08:36.100 --> 00:08:38.860
parallel computers. And that's where we've gotten
00:08:38.860 --> 00:08:43.580
to today. Now, the thing is that a lot of, I
00:08:43.580 --> 00:08:46.919
hope that a lot of businesses are at least dabbling
00:08:46.919 --> 00:08:51.000
in or getting used to using things like chat
00:08:51.000 --> 00:08:54.539
GPT and Claude, because these are very, very
00:08:54.539 --> 00:08:58.779
powerful tools. And you can do I mean, literally,
00:08:58.779 --> 00:09:02.720
I'm able to do weeks worth of work in a few hours.
00:09:02.960 --> 00:09:06.039
So if you get to know them, well, it can really
00:09:06.039 --> 00:09:09.279
as a small business owner, it can really be a
00:09:09.279 --> 00:09:13.059
huge benefit. But the problem that we see is
00:09:13.059 --> 00:09:16.549
very often people have businesses And there are
00:09:16.549 --> 00:09:19.830
studies to show this. When these systems are
00:09:19.830 --> 00:09:23.330
implemented and when they fail, a big problem
00:09:23.330 --> 00:09:28.889
is that businesses don't integrate the AI workflow
00:09:28.889 --> 00:09:32.529
into the rest of their work. So the AI becomes
00:09:32.529 --> 00:09:39.090
sort of this thing over there that is bolted
00:09:39.090 --> 00:09:42.970
on, I guess you could say. to the workflow and
00:09:42.970 --> 00:09:46.210
people are copying pasting from that back to
00:09:46.210 --> 00:09:48.490
their regular workflow and then back to the you
00:09:48.490 --> 00:09:54.190
know the AI system and so on and so forth and
00:09:54.190 --> 00:09:57.230
so because of that a lot of people really just
00:09:57.230 --> 00:09:59.590
kind of give up on using it because they don't
00:09:59.590 --> 00:10:01.490
really understand the power of it and they don't
00:10:01.490 --> 00:10:03.570
understand how to integrate it into their work
00:10:03.570 --> 00:10:06.350
so I would say as a small business person my
00:10:06.350 --> 00:10:09.639
first Suggestion to be really like use this stuff
00:10:09.639 --> 00:10:11.860
so that you really feel comfortable with it But
00:10:11.860 --> 00:10:15.139
second of all you need to figure out how to integrate
00:10:15.139 --> 00:10:18.679
it into your ongoing workflow and not Throw it
00:10:18.679 --> 00:10:21.120
at the people that are doing the work and just
00:10:21.120 --> 00:10:24.539
say, you know, good luck. Here we go Do what
00:10:24.539 --> 00:10:26.840
you can with it they need to people sort of need
00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:30.240
to be led to the right ways and the right use
00:10:30.240 --> 00:10:37.360
cases and the proper ways to integrate AI into
00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:39.279
their workflow. And that's a lot of work in and
00:10:39.279 --> 00:10:42.080
of itself. Yeah, I definitely get that because
00:10:42.080 --> 00:10:44.779
I would say that like one of the things I use
00:10:44.779 --> 00:10:47.799
AI for is with my podcast and my show notes.
00:10:48.179 --> 00:10:51.639
Yeah. So what I do after every single interview,
00:10:52.299 --> 00:10:56.360
I write a paragraph or two of what we discussed.
00:10:56.879 --> 00:11:00.600
Right. And then I have AI like, you know, match
00:11:00.600 --> 00:11:03.139
it or put it into the prompt until it's like,
00:11:03.139 --> 00:11:04.899
you know, based off the information I'm feeding
00:11:04.899 --> 00:11:08.220
it. It's writing a good description to where,
00:11:08.419 --> 00:11:12.159
when I post it on YouTube, and also like PiePage,
00:11:12.799 --> 00:11:17.620
it's able to be scoured by the internet. So therefore
00:11:17.620 --> 00:11:19.919
those keywords and all that start to show up
00:11:19.919 --> 00:11:23.440
and they're used in that language for the search
00:11:23.440 --> 00:11:25.539
engine. And I've seen that with my videos. They've
00:11:25.539 --> 00:11:28.419
been crawling higher and higher on Google search
00:11:28.419 --> 00:11:32.840
engines. Right. So you're using the AI basically
00:11:32.840 --> 00:11:36.149
to phrase things in a way that search engine
00:11:36.149 --> 00:11:39.990
optimization is going to pick up on. Yes. And
00:11:39.990 --> 00:11:42.230
that's a very good use of it. And I think that
00:11:42.230 --> 00:11:45.330
people are beginning to figure out how to integrate
00:11:45.330 --> 00:11:50.090
SEO search engine optimization with techniques
00:11:50.090 --> 00:11:52.850
like chat GPT or local models or whatever it
00:11:52.850 --> 00:11:54.870
is they're using. So that's actually a great,
00:11:54.870 --> 00:11:57.570
great. I mean, have you found it to be, it sounds
00:11:57.570 --> 00:12:00.429
like you found it to be successful. You're getting
00:12:00.429 --> 00:12:04.679
more hits on your podcasts and it it's working
00:12:04.679 --> 00:12:09.820
for you. Yeah. I don't like, you know, some people
00:12:09.820 --> 00:12:11.960
like even with like the thumbnails and stuff,
00:12:12.240 --> 00:12:14.440
I love pictures and things that I mentioned instead
00:12:14.440 --> 00:12:16.559
of trying to get it to create something just
00:12:16.559 --> 00:12:21.220
from typing in prompts. Yeah. And the artwork
00:12:21.220 --> 00:12:25.000
looks way better than a lot of people. So for
00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:27.080
example, people use it to let's say they have
00:12:27.080 --> 00:12:30.419
a small business and they deal with food. Yeah.
00:12:30.419 --> 00:12:33.039
Using a lot of AI generated food looking stuff
00:12:33.039 --> 00:12:35.200
in the mic. your cooking stuff doesn't even look
00:12:35.200 --> 00:12:37.519
like that, so a lot of people are rejecting those
00:12:37.519 --> 00:12:41.539
type of flyers and thumbnails and stuff. That's
00:12:41.539 --> 00:12:45.019
a problem, and there is a big issue, and I read
00:12:45.019 --> 00:12:48.600
a lot about this because it's, you know, out
00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:51.000
there, but also it's actually a topic I'm interested
00:12:51.000 --> 00:12:53.820
in. There's a big, it's very interesting because
00:12:53.820 --> 00:12:57.460
there's some people that feel as though AI is
00:12:57.460 --> 00:13:00.149
great and a blessing and it's going to do a lot
00:13:00.149 --> 00:13:04.070
for us. But there's also a very active school
00:13:04.070 --> 00:13:08.149
of thought out there that is in to greater and
00:13:08.149 --> 00:13:12.789
lesser degrees against using AI in these various
00:13:12.789 --> 00:13:16.210
business processes. Some of those are as simple
00:13:16.210 --> 00:13:18.110
as what you're talking about. Like, oh, the picture
00:13:18.110 --> 00:13:20.850
looks like it's AI, it's AI slop. That's the
00:13:20.850 --> 00:13:24.940
term people always use, AI slop. real food doesn't
00:13:24.940 --> 00:13:27.860
really look like that. Now there are ways to
00:13:27.860 --> 00:13:31.820
use AI in a way that you don't get AI slop. And
00:13:31.820 --> 00:13:33.919
the one thing that I think is really important
00:13:33.919 --> 00:13:37.019
and I always tell people is don't just take what
00:13:37.019 --> 00:13:41.179
the AI gives you and throw it out there. What
00:13:41.179 --> 00:13:44.980
you need to do is you need to test and check
00:13:44.980 --> 00:13:47.419
every single thing that it tells you because
00:13:47.419 --> 00:13:50.120
AI can be wrong and people don't realize that.
00:13:50.500 --> 00:13:54.289
One thing that AI is very good at is producing
00:13:54.289 --> 00:14:00.210
very slick, nice, what I call fluent looking
00:14:00.210 --> 00:14:04.049
output. So it looks really right. And I've written
00:14:04.049 --> 00:14:06.470
an article about this called Fluency is Validity.
00:14:06.730 --> 00:14:09.529
And the risk is that when something looks really
00:14:09.529 --> 00:14:11.850
right, looks well written, looks like it's arguing
00:14:11.850 --> 00:14:15.450
well, people very often, which is what AI is
00:14:15.450 --> 00:14:18.250
very strong at doing, people very often accept
00:14:18.250 --> 00:14:21.549
that at face value. and don't necessarily dive
00:14:21.549 --> 00:14:24.610
into what the actual argument is and whether
00:14:24.610 --> 00:14:29.129
it has merit or not. So AI can get take the most
00:14:29.129 --> 00:14:32.929
ridiculous sounding idea and make it sound very
00:14:32.929 --> 00:14:35.470
believable because that's what it's kind of programmed
00:14:35.470 --> 00:14:37.909
to do. It's programmed to continue to engage
00:14:37.909 --> 00:14:41.649
you. It's programmed to make you think that what
00:14:41.649 --> 00:14:43.970
you're talking about is the greatest idea in
00:14:43.970 --> 00:14:47.549
the world. We call this significance. And that's
00:14:47.549 --> 00:14:49.470
something that people have to guard against in
00:14:49.470 --> 00:14:51.929
any field, whether it's business or academia
00:14:51.929 --> 00:14:54.909
or whatever they're using it for. And there are
00:14:54.909 --> 00:14:57.789
a whole bunch of techniques that you can use
00:14:57.789 --> 00:15:00.909
and that people, I think, need to be more aware
00:15:00.909 --> 00:15:03.809
of that are actually good techniques when you're
00:15:03.809 --> 00:15:06.750
just dealing with media in general. So not even
00:15:06.750 --> 00:15:12.549
just AI, but also just Ways to verify and validate
00:15:12.549 --> 00:15:14.830
when you read an article whether it's generated
00:15:14.830 --> 00:15:17.970
by AI or whether it's generated by a human being
00:15:17.970 --> 00:15:21.149
or some combination thereof You need to check
00:15:21.149 --> 00:15:23.429
and verify every single thing in there and not
00:15:23.429 --> 00:15:26.070
take it for face value And I think that that's
00:15:26.070 --> 00:15:29.610
kind of the key to keeping a lot of this technology
00:15:29.610 --> 00:15:35.250
useful But not harming people Yeah, one things
00:15:35.250 --> 00:15:39.450
I discovered was like truth mode telling it to
00:15:39.450 --> 00:15:43.590
give me truthful answers that are based off of
00:15:43.590 --> 00:15:46.809
data. And now, like you said, talk to me like,
00:15:47.269 --> 00:15:49.529
oh, your ideas are great. And now that's why
00:15:49.529 --> 00:15:52.769
this was work, especially when it comes to marketing.
00:15:53.129 --> 00:15:56.289
Because I think a lot of times we're misled.
00:15:56.669 --> 00:16:00.470
Like you said, it's a believing that it sounds
00:16:00.470 --> 00:16:03.549
good. Right. But what's the old saying? If it
00:16:03.549 --> 00:16:07.029
sounds too good to be true, it's not. It probably
00:16:07.029 --> 00:16:09.850
is. Yeah. So I'm curious what, so when you use
00:16:09.850 --> 00:16:11.730
truth mode, what do you do exactly? How does
00:16:11.730 --> 00:16:15.070
that work for you? So me with creative ideas
00:16:15.070 --> 00:16:20.830
and also marketing driven data. So for instance,
00:16:21.049 --> 00:16:25.409
I'll give this example. I was asking about small
00:16:25.409 --> 00:16:27.850
businesses, especially in particular to like.
00:16:28.670 --> 00:16:33.029
how small businesses look at marketing and advertising
00:16:33.029 --> 00:16:35.429
and investing in their company. And it was telling
00:16:35.429 --> 00:16:39.649
me like, you know, what percentage of small businesses
00:16:39.649 --> 00:16:43.269
are using like, you know, AI and running marketing
00:16:43.269 --> 00:16:45.649
strategies and stuff like that. And then I wanted
00:16:45.649 --> 00:16:48.129
to go into more of a subsection of like, okay,
00:16:48.289 --> 00:16:52.470
so now black owned businesses, do they use marketing?
00:16:52.669 --> 00:16:54.190
And I was like, yeah, they rely on this and that
00:16:54.190 --> 00:16:56.419
and all this stuff. And then I was going back
00:16:56.419 --> 00:16:58.019
and forth with it because I was telling it based
00:16:58.019 --> 00:16:59.960
on my experience of, you know, doing marketing
00:16:59.960 --> 00:17:02.139
for 20 years and working a lot with black owned
00:17:02.139 --> 00:17:06.359
businesses. The ones I run across and of course,
00:17:06.359 --> 00:17:07.839
you know, you can't group everybody together
00:17:07.839 --> 00:17:10.240
because everybody's business is different. Right.
00:17:10.299 --> 00:17:14.400
But generally speaking, if they fall within,
00:17:14.619 --> 00:17:17.940
let's say that I like to call the infancy stage
00:17:17.940 --> 00:17:20.099
or whatever, you know, zero years to just getting
00:17:20.099 --> 00:17:22.559
started to about three or four years. Right.
00:17:22.559 --> 00:17:26.589
It was negative condensation. when it comes to
00:17:26.589 --> 00:17:29.349
wanting to spend money on marketing and thinking
00:17:29.349 --> 00:17:31.970
that they could just do everything for free basically
00:17:31.970 --> 00:17:35.329
on social media and not get somebody's third
00:17:35.329 --> 00:17:39.750
party's perspective on how they should brand
00:17:39.750 --> 00:17:41.970
their business in order to attract the clients
00:17:41.970 --> 00:17:45.170
and understand that it's a process with like
00:17:45.170 --> 00:17:49.250
a sales funnel and all that. And when I was getting
00:17:49.250 --> 00:17:51.009
the information from AI, I was like, you know,
00:17:51.009 --> 00:17:54.420
just basically trying to give me like data, but
00:17:54.420 --> 00:17:57.220
in truth, I was like, no, this is not being the
00:17:57.220 --> 00:17:59.460
experiences I've had. I've actually have a lot
00:17:59.460 --> 00:18:01.539
of people who actually run from it because they're
00:18:01.539 --> 00:18:04.759
fearful and they also have like a like a trauma
00:18:04.759 --> 00:18:08.299
associated with doing this because they will
00:18:08.299 --> 00:18:12.700
have an experience with maybe somebody and they'll
00:18:12.700 --> 00:18:15.220
have that bad experience. So then they group
00:18:15.220 --> 00:18:18.339
everybody else who could help them with their
00:18:18.339 --> 00:18:23.140
business within marketing in the same they'll
00:18:23.140 --> 00:18:26.980
put them in the same monolithic group. It's harder
00:18:26.980 --> 00:18:29.940
to get that sale, the next person who comes behind
00:18:29.940 --> 00:18:32.799
someone, whoever gave someone a bad experience.
00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:36.160
Right. So they overgeneralized from one bad to
00:18:36.160 --> 00:18:39.759
another. Yeah, it did. And then when I was going
00:18:39.759 --> 00:18:42.599
back and forth with that, we gained to a consensus
00:18:42.599 --> 00:18:49.240
like, no, you're right, that this isn't... everyone
00:18:49.240 --> 00:18:52.779
doesn't just look at stuff from this, I guess,
00:18:52.960 --> 00:18:58.779
generic point of view. Yeah. So it was very interesting.
00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:01.059
And then I always ask it, are you still in truth
00:19:01.059 --> 00:19:02.440
mode? Because I don't like to take them out of
00:19:02.440 --> 00:19:05.420
truth mode. Because I won't, when I have ideas,
00:19:05.640 --> 00:19:11.619
especially creative ideas, and how will this
00:19:11.619 --> 00:19:14.619
idea, you know, what's the, I guess the probability
00:19:14.619 --> 00:19:17.819
of it doing well in the marketplace? Yeah. I
00:19:17.819 --> 00:19:20.819
want something that's based off of data and what
00:19:20.819 --> 00:19:22.779
other people have done that's probably similar
00:19:22.779 --> 00:19:26.019
to it. And that's something that's just going
00:19:26.019 --> 00:19:29.859
to agree with me. If it doesn't, if it's a bad
00:19:29.859 --> 00:19:33.920
idea, just tell me it's a bad idea. Right. And
00:19:33.920 --> 00:19:35.920
that's the problem is a lot of times. So do you
00:19:35.920 --> 00:19:38.079
find when you put it in truth mode, is it actually
00:19:38.079 --> 00:19:42.259
truthful? I've had some things that really appear
00:19:42.259 --> 00:19:46.180
to be truthful. Of course, like you said, it
00:19:46.180 --> 00:19:49.599
can make some mistakes, but I think I use AI
00:19:49.599 --> 00:19:51.799
differently than a lot of other people because
00:19:51.799 --> 00:19:55.759
I'm going back and forth with it until I know
00:19:55.759 --> 00:19:57.900
based off of my experience and education of what
00:19:57.900 --> 00:20:00.599
I've been able to do and what would more than
00:20:00.599 --> 00:20:03.759
likely be the outcome if this particular strategy
00:20:03.759 --> 00:20:06.519
was implemented as opposed to, you know, just
00:20:06.519 --> 00:20:11.089
taking everything at face value. So I don't know
00:20:11.089 --> 00:20:13.109
if I don't I don't know a lot of people will
00:20:13.109 --> 00:20:16.710
go back and forth with it. Yeah. So you're saying
00:20:16.710 --> 00:20:20.890
most people just type something in and get something
00:20:20.890 --> 00:20:24.410
out and then they run with that. And you have
00:20:24.410 --> 00:20:27.569
a dialogue with it. I do every single time I'm
00:20:27.569 --> 00:20:31.710
having to die for with it. That's very helpful.
00:20:32.309 --> 00:20:35.269
Exactly. Because that's and that's the thing
00:20:35.269 --> 00:20:38.980
is that's an aspect of it. of AI that I think
00:20:38.980 --> 00:20:43.160
that a lot of people aren't really using. And
00:20:43.160 --> 00:20:47.019
that's what I do as well. So many people just
00:20:47.019 --> 00:20:48.759
say, oh, I'm going to type something in. It's
00:20:48.759 --> 00:20:50.259
like a search engine. It's going to give me an
00:20:50.259 --> 00:20:52.359
answer. And I'll just paste that in. But actually,
00:20:52.720 --> 00:20:57.960
it can be much more useful as a thought partner.
00:20:58.960 --> 00:21:02.019
And so to do exactly the kinds of things you're
00:21:02.019 --> 00:21:04.539
doing where you're saying, oh, here's an idea
00:21:04.539 --> 00:21:06.720
I had. What are the good aspects of it? But what
00:21:06.720 --> 00:21:08.839
are the, you know, tell me some of the reasons
00:21:08.839 --> 00:21:11.799
maybe this isn't a good idea. And then have it
00:21:11.799 --> 00:21:14.660
give you its response. And then you say, but
00:21:14.660 --> 00:21:17.099
what about this? What about that? What about
00:21:17.099 --> 00:21:22.259
the other thing? And a good AI system can help
00:21:22.259 --> 00:21:26.200
to expose a lot of the assumptions in a lot of
00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:29.640
the ideas. that you're working through, but you're
00:21:29.640 --> 00:21:32.880
not going to get that if you just type in a single
00:21:32.880 --> 00:21:36.220
prompt and get a response and paste it in. And
00:21:36.220 --> 00:21:40.259
I think that's where a lot of the value of AI
00:21:40.259 --> 00:21:43.960
is being left on the table. People are using
00:21:43.960 --> 00:21:46.460
it the way you're using it, which is really the
00:21:46.460 --> 00:21:49.480
right way to use it, which is as an interactive
00:21:49.480 --> 00:21:54.119
partner and not as the final say of whatever
00:21:54.119 --> 00:21:58.910
it is you're trying to do. And so I would say
00:21:58.910 --> 00:22:02.450
my other suggestion to business owners could
00:22:02.450 --> 00:22:05.049
be to do exactly what you're doing, which is
00:22:05.049 --> 00:22:08.309
great, which is to not think of it as an Oracle
00:22:08.309 --> 00:22:11.609
that's gonna give you a final answer, but rather
00:22:11.609 --> 00:22:14.869
think of it as a thinking partner that you can
00:22:14.869 --> 00:22:17.490
bounce ideas off of. And maybe it will come up
00:22:17.490 --> 00:22:19.210
with new ideas that you haven't come up with,
00:22:19.210 --> 00:22:23.420
but you still need to. evaluate and decide if
00:22:23.420 --> 00:22:25.799
those ideas are actually as good as it seems
00:22:25.799 --> 00:22:28.339
to think they are. So that's the direction I'd
00:22:28.339 --> 00:22:31.779
like to see people leading into. What do you
00:22:31.779 --> 00:22:35.420
say when people, you know, they use AI and I've
00:22:35.420 --> 00:22:38.579
seen headlines in media where they're talking
00:22:38.579 --> 00:22:40.740
about like the loss of jobs and things of that
00:22:40.740 --> 00:22:44.539
nature and seems more of a scare tactic than
00:22:44.539 --> 00:22:50.960
an educational piece of information. Well, When
00:22:50.960 --> 00:22:54.660
you have any new technology, historically speaking,
00:22:55.180 --> 00:22:57.740
what's happened is there's been a loss of jobs,
00:22:57.980 --> 00:23:00.319
but there hasn't been a loss of employment because
00:23:00.319 --> 00:23:04.380
what happens is that the new technology shifts
00:23:04.380 --> 00:23:06.799
and creates all sorts of new work for people
00:23:06.799 --> 00:23:09.839
to do that didn't exist before. And very often
00:23:09.839 --> 00:23:11.640
that work is actually a lot more interesting
00:23:11.640 --> 00:23:14.079
than what people were doing before. So at one
00:23:14.079 --> 00:23:17.450
time you had rooms full of people with those
00:23:17.450 --> 00:23:20.589
electronic calculators doing banking business,
00:23:20.609 --> 00:23:23.529
for example, and putting things in folders and
00:23:23.529 --> 00:23:26.970
in filing cabinets. And then when the computer
00:23:26.970 --> 00:23:29.490
came along and all of that became automated,
00:23:30.289 --> 00:23:32.630
those people didn't have a job anymore, but they
00:23:32.630 --> 00:23:35.910
were still able to do, you know, to be supervising
00:23:35.910 --> 00:23:38.890
the computers or supervising the work of the
00:23:38.890 --> 00:23:41.529
bank in some way or another, or often different
00:23:41.529 --> 00:23:45.960
jobs. And so far, every single technological
00:23:45.960 --> 00:23:50.720
advancement has actually led to an increase in
00:23:50.720 --> 00:23:53.859
employment overall. Now, I mean, admittedly,
00:23:53.859 --> 00:23:56.660
there's disruption because people need to learn
00:23:56.660 --> 00:24:02.579
new skills. They may need to retool. Sometimes
00:24:02.579 --> 00:24:04.880
if someone's been in the workforce for a while,
00:24:05.180 --> 00:24:07.579
they may be so used to doing what they're doing
00:24:07.579 --> 00:24:10.180
that it's a burden for them to learn this set
00:24:10.180 --> 00:24:13.559
of new skills. So I'm not saying that it's without
00:24:13.599 --> 00:24:16.079
some degree of cost, but I don't think there's
00:24:16.079 --> 00:24:21.099
a risk of AI taking over and nobody having any
00:24:21.099 --> 00:24:23.339
work anymore and everyone being out of a job
00:24:23.339 --> 00:24:25.579
because again, there's always going to be some
00:24:25.579 --> 00:24:30.380
things that can't do that humans do better. So
00:24:30.380 --> 00:24:36.799
with the greater industries, I know that there's
00:24:36.799 --> 00:24:38.940
been a disruption, let's say people who design
00:24:38.940 --> 00:24:41.099
flyers and stuff like that, because a lot of
00:24:41.099 --> 00:24:44.259
times they have to design flyers. And then they
00:24:44.259 --> 00:24:49.019
say that photography and videography work, I
00:24:49.019 --> 00:24:51.460
don't necessarily believe that because I don't
00:24:51.460 --> 00:24:53.759
see any AI walking around here actually shooting
00:24:53.759 --> 00:24:57.680
stuff. And regardless of how much people shoot
00:24:57.680 --> 00:25:00.759
and upload, everyone's eye is just different.
00:25:00.839 --> 00:25:02.400
You're going to capture something different.
00:25:02.980 --> 00:25:05.299
What do you say to people like that as far as
00:25:05.299 --> 00:25:07.819
it disrupting those industries and they feeling
00:25:07.819 --> 00:25:11.940
that within X amount of years, AI can... either
00:25:11.940 --> 00:25:16.420
take over or substantially cut those jobs out.
00:25:17.599 --> 00:25:19.240
I mean, I think it's a very good possibility,
00:25:19.240 --> 00:25:22.660
again, that there are certain job categories.
00:25:23.140 --> 00:25:24.859
You know, if you're talking about flyers being
00:25:24.859 --> 00:25:28.420
handed out, I mean, already we have the Internet,
00:25:28.579 --> 00:25:31.720
which has made using the mail and putting flyers
00:25:31.720 --> 00:25:34.859
in the mail obsolete for many, many years now
00:25:34.859 --> 00:25:37.940
and has. But again, let's take a look at what
00:25:37.940 --> 00:25:42.819
happened. So. department stores and catalog sales
00:25:42.819 --> 00:25:46.960
suffered. But what you have now is this huge
00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:52.619
online booming internet economy. And there's
00:25:52.619 --> 00:25:57.640
lots of jobs there. And so what you have is not
00:25:57.759 --> 00:25:59.839
that people aren't buying anything anymore. It's
00:25:59.839 --> 00:26:02.380
just that they're buying it in a different way.
00:26:02.599 --> 00:26:04.359
And I think that that will be true for a lot
00:26:04.359 --> 00:26:06.619
of these things. They may not be consuming items
00:26:06.619 --> 00:26:09.099
in the same way. The items may be produced differently.
00:26:09.700 --> 00:26:12.539
Some of them may be, in fact, produced by AI.
00:26:13.019 --> 00:26:15.740
But then, you know, let's say the photographer,
00:26:15.940 --> 00:26:20.019
for example, that's going to free that photographer
00:26:20.019 --> 00:26:23.819
up to do other probably more creative work than
00:26:23.819 --> 00:26:25.839
what they were doing. And I think that's a net
00:26:25.839 --> 00:26:29.880
positive. So someone who is just taking pictures
00:26:29.880 --> 00:26:32.579
of oranges, and now you don't need to do that
00:26:32.579 --> 00:26:35.400
because if you want to advertise oranges, you
00:26:35.400 --> 00:26:38.000
just have AI generate a picture of an orange.
00:26:38.460 --> 00:26:41.220
Well, those people may be out of a job taking
00:26:41.220 --> 00:26:44.380
those pictures, but there's a whole range of
00:26:44.380 --> 00:26:47.660
creative opportunities that they can get into
00:26:47.660 --> 00:26:50.200
that AI is not going to immediately replace.
00:26:50.599 --> 00:26:53.440
And I think that's going to be much more the
00:26:53.440 --> 00:26:57.839
pattern. of what you see with AI than everybody
00:26:57.839 --> 00:27:03.200
being thrown out of work. But with it increasing
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:06.039
efficiency, like you said, you're able to do
00:27:06.039 --> 00:27:09.019
work that would normally take longer, maybe days
00:27:09.019 --> 00:27:12.519
at a time. You can pack it into two hours. Oh,
00:27:12.559 --> 00:27:17.160
absolutely. Do you think that employers or just
00:27:17.160 --> 00:27:21.799
industries in general will require more productivity?
00:27:23.230 --> 00:27:25.329
I think they will. And I think that's happening
00:27:25.329 --> 00:27:29.569
already. But productivity gains because of technology
00:27:29.569 --> 00:27:31.950
are not anything new. I mean, if you think about,
00:27:32.089 --> 00:27:36.190
again, back to those people with the hand calculators
00:27:36.190 --> 00:27:40.970
in the back room of the bank grinding away, once
00:27:40.970 --> 00:27:44.670
you got computers in the picture there, the productivity
00:27:44.670 --> 00:27:50.269
per individual went up amazingly high because
00:27:50.269 --> 00:27:53.519
you didn't have to have the bottleneck of an
00:27:53.519 --> 00:27:56.220
individual grinding through a column of numbers
00:27:56.220 --> 00:28:01.400
for a period of time. So I think that the question
00:28:01.400 --> 00:28:04.859
is going to be sort of where do those productivity
00:28:04.859 --> 00:28:10.400
gains get, who benefits from them? So if you
00:28:10.400 --> 00:28:15.920
get a person who suddenly is 10x more productive,
00:28:16.579 --> 00:28:19.539
is that going to be reflected in their paycheck?
00:28:19.700 --> 00:28:21.980
Is that going to be reflected in some other aspect
00:28:21.980 --> 00:28:24.819
of their compensation? Or are they just going
00:28:24.819 --> 00:28:27.660
to be expected to continue working as hard as
00:28:27.660 --> 00:28:30.460
they've been doing at the same salary? And that's
00:28:30.460 --> 00:28:32.420
a discussion I think that we need to have because
00:28:32.420 --> 00:28:34.779
I think there is something to be said for there
00:28:34.779 --> 00:28:41.200
being a sort of technology dividend. So in other
00:28:41.200 --> 00:28:45.940
words, that all of us should benefit somehow.
00:28:46.250 --> 00:28:49.769
from this new technology, as opposed to just
00:28:49.769 --> 00:28:52.430
the people at the very top running the companies.
00:28:52.990 --> 00:28:55.490
And what that benefit should be, I don't know.
00:28:56.109 --> 00:28:59.049
But there should be some way. And this was something
00:28:59.049 --> 00:29:01.069
that was very big in the 50s that unfortunately
00:29:01.069 --> 00:29:04.230
never really came to pass. I mean, in the 50s,
00:29:04.329 --> 00:29:06.529
automation, we were all going to be pressing
00:29:06.529 --> 00:29:08.869
a button and cooking dinner. And so we would
00:29:08.869 --> 00:29:12.089
all be out playing tennis or golf or swimming.
00:29:12.089 --> 00:29:14.589
And then, you know, we come in from our two hour
00:29:14.589 --> 00:29:18.250
work week, like in the Jetsons. And that never
00:29:18.250 --> 00:29:21.390
really came to pass for a variety of reasons.
00:29:21.470 --> 00:29:26.150
But I think that's much more that's less a technology
00:29:26.150 --> 00:29:29.750
issue and more a social issue. So that's more
00:29:29.750 --> 00:29:34.059
about how do we want to choose? to allocate those
00:29:34.059 --> 00:29:36.920
resources that we've subtly freed up by having
00:29:36.920 --> 00:29:40.460
all of this work done by machines. And, you know,
00:29:40.519 --> 00:29:42.720
for example, right now, I mean, a big question
00:29:42.720 --> 00:29:46.940
is happening with Amazon drivers. They're considered
00:29:46.940 --> 00:29:51.640
to be basically not full time employees, but
00:29:51.640 --> 00:29:56.309
contractors. And there's a foot to. Make it so
00:29:56.309 --> 00:29:58.069
that they're treated as full -time employees
00:29:58.069 --> 00:30:00.309
of Amazon just like anyone else working Amazon
00:30:00.309 --> 00:30:04.470
which would increase their benefits so that's
00:30:04.470 --> 00:30:06.309
the kind of and you know, of course Amazon's
00:30:06.309 --> 00:30:07.750
against that they don't want to pay the money
00:30:07.750 --> 00:30:12.250
but That's the kind of tension. I think that's
00:30:12.250 --> 00:30:14.750
gonna have to be resolved and we're gonna kind
00:30:14.750 --> 00:30:18.490
of have to have a National coming -together moment
00:30:18.490 --> 00:30:23.309
to figure out how to equitably divide up this
00:30:23.309 --> 00:30:25.549
dividend so it's not just all going to a bunch
00:30:25.549 --> 00:30:28.670
of people at the top. I definitely agree with
00:30:28.670 --> 00:30:30.650
that because I think a lot of people at the top
00:30:30.650 --> 00:30:33.470
didn't get enough anyway. So why not share the
00:30:33.470 --> 00:30:37.049
wealth? Yeah, they're getting a lot already and
00:30:37.049 --> 00:30:39.650
the problem is that the system is kind of set
00:30:39.650 --> 00:30:46.309
up to allow them to continue that. process of
00:30:46.309 --> 00:30:49.470
getting a lot and getting more. And I don't know
00:30:49.470 --> 00:30:52.809
what kind of downward pressure is going to come
00:30:52.809 --> 00:30:57.529
about to make it so that there's more of a general
00:30:57.529 --> 00:31:00.529
distribution. When I'm not talking about a redistribution
00:31:00.529 --> 00:31:02.930
of wealth, I'm just talking about if a company
00:31:02.930 --> 00:31:06.690
is able to perform 10X better, then that should,
00:31:06.690 --> 00:31:08.930
I think, be reflected. Now, maybe you make the
00:31:08.930 --> 00:31:10.690
employees stockholders or something like that.
00:31:10.690 --> 00:31:12.650
And so then the value of their stock goes up.
00:31:13.369 --> 00:31:16.890
I don't know what the solution is, but I think
00:31:16.890 --> 00:31:20.549
that there definitely needs to be a way to make
00:31:20.549 --> 00:31:25.650
sure that this sudden boost in productive capability
00:31:25.650 --> 00:31:29.490
is spread more evenly than it seems to be right
00:31:29.490 --> 00:31:33.829
now. To me, that's just basic fairness. Yeah,
00:31:33.829 --> 00:31:38.049
which I definitely agree with it. I have a question.
00:31:38.309 --> 00:31:43.279
I was looking at a different interview and Yeah,
00:31:43.279 --> 00:31:45.700
we're talking about, I believe, like the European
00:31:45.700 --> 00:31:50.859
Union in 2027 is going to form compliance with
00:31:50.859 --> 00:31:56.359
AI. Yes. Yes. My question is, well, it could
00:31:56.359 --> 00:31:59.160
be a two part question. One, in doing something
00:31:59.160 --> 00:32:03.720
like this, I don't know if they're doing this,
00:32:03.920 --> 00:32:07.680
are they looking to like experts like you to
00:32:07.680 --> 00:32:12.119
actually help draw the diplomacy of compliance?
00:32:12.480 --> 00:32:16.519
And then also, who gets to set the rules for
00:32:16.519 --> 00:32:20.140
compliance? Because if people are using AI, like
00:32:20.140 --> 00:32:23.480
you say, in just generality, the wrong way, or
00:32:23.480 --> 00:32:27.579
don't understand how sophisticated it is, how
00:32:27.579 --> 00:32:36.759
can a body of people decide its complicity? Right.
00:32:37.259 --> 00:32:40.859
Exactly. Well, The EU is actually already getting
00:32:40.859 --> 00:32:43.940
pretty involved in AI much more so than the United
00:32:43.940 --> 00:32:47.299
States. For one thing, they now require watermarking.
00:32:47.960 --> 00:32:51.000
So anytime you generate something using AI, there's
00:32:51.000 --> 00:32:54.140
sort of a hidden code in the way the words are
00:32:54.140 --> 00:32:56.740
arranged that doesn't affect the output, but
00:32:56.740 --> 00:32:59.000
that is supposed to be, at least supposedly,
00:32:59.720 --> 00:33:02.700
detectable as having come from AI. And that's
00:33:02.700 --> 00:33:05.279
something that comes from the EU. Now, what's
00:33:05.279 --> 00:33:09.509
coming up in 2027? Really, no one really knows
00:33:09.509 --> 00:33:13.029
what's going to happen. This is a group of politicians
00:33:13.029 --> 00:33:15.769
and probably some European technologists, but
00:33:15.769 --> 00:33:20.230
AI does not really have the strong presence in
00:33:20.230 --> 00:33:22.609
Europe that it does in the United States. So
00:33:22.609 --> 00:33:25.170
I'm not sure where they're getting their technologists
00:33:25.170 --> 00:33:29.240
from. But right now, a lot of what's happening
00:33:29.240 --> 00:33:32.140
is that a lot of companies kind of know that
00:33:32.140 --> 00:33:33.880
sometime next year, they're going to have to
00:33:33.880 --> 00:33:37.259
start complying if they want to work in the EU.
00:33:37.940 --> 00:33:41.380
But everything is really up in the air as far
00:33:41.380 --> 00:33:43.960
as what exactly that is going to mean. I mean,
00:33:44.039 --> 00:33:47.140
is it going to mean having a third party that
00:33:47.140 --> 00:33:50.220
goes through a checklist of things to make sure
00:33:50.220 --> 00:33:53.180
that the AI that you're using has proper guardrails
00:33:53.180 --> 00:33:55.940
and a safe and that they actually certify that
00:33:55.940 --> 00:33:58.180
and you know they sign their names to it kind
00:33:58.180 --> 00:34:01.000
of like a banking examiner or is it going to
00:34:01.000 --> 00:34:04.759
mean something different and at this point we
00:34:04.759 --> 00:34:07.380
really don't know I wouldn't be hugely surprised
00:34:07.380 --> 00:34:10.179
if it doesn't get kicked down the road you know
00:34:10.179 --> 00:34:14.690
to 2028 or 2029 because It's such a complicated
00:34:14.690 --> 00:34:18.550
issue and there's so many stakeholders involved
00:34:18.550 --> 00:34:23.090
that it's kind of a little hard to imagine that
00:34:23.090 --> 00:34:27.530
it's going to become completely resolved within
00:34:27.530 --> 00:34:29.909
the next year. And you know, in this country
00:34:29.909 --> 00:34:32.269
as well, there's a lot of calls and I don't know
00:34:32.269 --> 00:34:33.789
how successful these are going to be. There are
00:34:33.789 --> 00:34:38.809
a lot of calls to put moratoriums on both the
00:34:38.809 --> 00:34:41.670
building out of new data centers because those
00:34:41.670 --> 00:34:43.670
are obviously very controversial. They use a
00:34:43.670 --> 00:34:47.630
lot of power. They use a lot of water. And also
00:34:47.630 --> 00:34:51.929
just on AI development in general. And I'm not
00:34:51.929 --> 00:34:56.010
sure how a national moratorium on AI development
00:34:56.010 --> 00:34:58.769
would even work because you can't stop individual
00:34:58.769 --> 00:35:01.829
researchers from continuing to do their work.
00:35:02.489 --> 00:35:04.769
I don't know what you would have inspectors go
00:35:04.769 --> 00:35:08.170
into open AI labs or Claude's labs and make sure
00:35:08.170 --> 00:35:10.940
they're not doing any they're not up to anything.
00:35:11.400 --> 00:35:14.420
And then you have China. And there's no reason
00:35:14.420 --> 00:35:17.599
that China is going to sign on to that kind of
00:35:17.599 --> 00:35:20.840
an agreement as well. Because they're doing really
00:35:20.840 --> 00:35:23.500
well with, you know, they're definitely in the
00:35:23.500 --> 00:35:25.500
running in the AI race, and they're producing
00:35:25.500 --> 00:35:29.679
a lot of very valuable, open models, which a
00:35:29.679 --> 00:35:34.480
lot of American companies aren't. And so I think
00:35:34.480 --> 00:35:37.480
the whole field right now, it's really very much
00:35:37.849 --> 00:35:41.590
a wild west. We don't really know where all of
00:35:41.590 --> 00:35:44.329
the dust is going to settle. It's kind of like
00:35:44.329 --> 00:35:48.489
the very early days of the web and the internet
00:35:48.489 --> 00:35:53.250
when the idea of using the web to advertise was
00:35:53.250 --> 00:35:56.289
seen as just an awful, awful idea. And the first
00:35:56.289 --> 00:35:59.030
person that did it got a lot of criticism. And
00:35:59.030 --> 00:36:02.030
of course now, I mean, that seems ridiculous.
00:36:02.329 --> 00:36:04.050
Yes, certain engines were controversial because
00:36:04.050 --> 00:36:07.289
of privacy concerns. All of these things, looking
00:36:07.289 --> 00:36:08.789
back on them, and I think we're going to find
00:36:08.789 --> 00:36:11.909
that a lot of probably it's going to be more
00:36:11.909 --> 00:36:13.929
laissez -faire and a lot of the things that we
00:36:13.929 --> 00:36:16.929
worry about now, we'll look back at and say,
00:36:16.969 --> 00:36:19.929
God, what were we even thinking about? Because
00:36:19.929 --> 00:36:23.250
look at how far we've come just in terms of like
00:36:23.250 --> 00:36:27.610
social media didn't exist a little over 20 years
00:36:27.610 --> 00:36:34.730
ago. And it's become so fully integrated into
00:36:34.920 --> 00:36:38.880
our lives. And there are certainly very strong
00:36:38.880 --> 00:36:41.519
arguments to be made for regulating it, but that
00:36:41.519 --> 00:36:43.480
never really came to pass. And now it's kind
00:36:43.480 --> 00:36:46.239
of too late. I mean, there's really no clear
00:36:46.239 --> 00:36:50.400
set of steps that you could put into play to
00:36:50.400 --> 00:36:53.739
regulate social media. So we're kind of for good
00:36:53.739 --> 00:36:56.920
or bad stuck with it the way it is. So I think
00:36:56.920 --> 00:37:00.690
it's probably going to be less something planned
00:37:00.690 --> 00:37:03.190
out and more sort of a whole bunch of different
00:37:03.190 --> 00:37:06.889
little ad hoc things come together. And we figure
00:37:06.889 --> 00:37:11.170
out some sort of compromise, but probably no
00:37:11.170 --> 00:37:13.070
one is going to be happy because no one ever
00:37:13.070 --> 00:37:18.630
is happy with a good compromise. This is amazing.
00:37:19.989 --> 00:37:23.829
So I want you to explain a little bit of the
00:37:23.829 --> 00:37:27.719
complexity. of AI because most people just think
00:37:27.719 --> 00:37:30.380
of it like as a computer. You go and put information
00:37:30.380 --> 00:37:34.360
in and it researches and spits out information.
00:37:35.099 --> 00:37:38.159
And one thing I came across, I believe you was
00:37:38.159 --> 00:37:41.860
given an example of I think a 1958 experiment
00:37:41.860 --> 00:37:45.059
where they were talking to kids and made up a
00:37:45.059 --> 00:37:49.000
word. And then that particular word, because
00:37:49.000 --> 00:37:51.519
they said there were two of them, the kids naturally
00:37:51.519 --> 00:37:55.889
pluralized it. the language in how that relates
00:37:55.889 --> 00:38:00.690
to AI in the way that it arrives at its decision.
00:38:01.949 --> 00:38:08.150
Well, so that's out of a sort of area of more
00:38:08.150 --> 00:38:11.409
psycholinguistic, psychological, cognitive psychology
00:38:11.409 --> 00:38:14.550
research. And that basically is an area that
00:38:14.550 --> 00:38:16.869
I'm interested in, which has to do with trying
00:38:16.869 --> 00:38:21.539
to figure out to what extent these computer models
00:38:21.539 --> 00:38:25.199
are similar to humans when they use language.
00:38:25.340 --> 00:38:27.800
And there's a lot of ways in which they're completely
00:38:27.800 --> 00:38:31.380
not like humans at all. And I think that's an
00:38:31.380 --> 00:38:33.179
important thing to keep in mind because people
00:38:33.179 --> 00:38:35.840
think that they're alive, they're human, they're
00:38:35.840 --> 00:38:40.000
talking to them. But if you break down what they're
00:38:40.000 --> 00:38:44.260
doing, in some ways, it's incredibly simple compared
00:38:44.260 --> 00:38:48.099
to how humans process information and process
00:38:48.099 --> 00:38:51.030
language. point that I always think is just fascinating
00:38:51.030 --> 00:38:55.449
is when you look at the amount of energy that
00:38:55.449 --> 00:38:59.690
a human brain needs, it's like a light bulb or
00:38:59.690 --> 00:39:03.710
something tiny like that, compared to the huge
00:39:03.710 --> 00:39:07.150
amounts of energy that one of these queries requires
00:39:07.150 --> 00:39:10.590
in order to process. So right there, that tells
00:39:10.590 --> 00:39:14.190
us that something's not the same about these
00:39:14.190 --> 00:39:17.469
two processes, because whatever we're doing can
00:39:17.469 --> 00:39:22.489
be done with much less energy consumption than
00:39:22.489 --> 00:39:26.130
the method that we're using now for algorithms
00:39:26.130 --> 00:39:29.889
in the computer. To your point about the wugs,
00:39:30.369 --> 00:39:32.809
what you were talking about is that way back
00:39:32.809 --> 00:39:36.909
in the day, they wanted to see how children acquired
00:39:36.909 --> 00:39:42.889
rules like the plural is a dash S. You would
00:39:42.889 --> 00:39:46.510
give someone, a kid, a new like a made -up word,
00:39:46.639 --> 00:39:51.559
a wug and you would say, here's two of them,
00:39:51.599 --> 00:39:53.360
what do you have? And they would say two wugs.
00:39:53.920 --> 00:39:57.679
And the idea of that was that they had generalized
00:39:57.679 --> 00:40:04.039
a rule that to make a plural, you add an S to
00:40:04.039 --> 00:40:08.119
a word. And the point is that that rule applied
00:40:08.119 --> 00:40:11.599
to things that you had never seen before. And
00:40:11.599 --> 00:40:15.860
that kind of is the basis for a lot of linguistic
00:40:15.860 --> 00:40:19.119
theory because you obviously have to have some
00:40:19.119 --> 00:40:23.079
system that lets you introduce new words into
00:40:23.079 --> 00:40:25.739
the child's vocabulary and not have them be completely
00:40:25.739 --> 00:40:29.639
confused. And the same was done, there was a
00:40:29.639 --> 00:40:32.579
lot of work done with the past tense as well.
00:40:33.000 --> 00:40:34.739
And what you see in children is very interesting.
00:40:34.800 --> 00:40:37.940
What you see in children is that they learn the
00:40:37.940 --> 00:40:45.079
irregular past tense like went quite But then
00:40:45.079 --> 00:40:49.619
they use the, when they learn the dash ED for
00:40:49.619 --> 00:40:51.960
the regular, sometimes they over -correct and
00:40:51.960 --> 00:40:55.440
they start saying goat. And then they go and
00:40:55.440 --> 00:40:59.260
say, went again. And I actually, many people
00:40:59.260 --> 00:41:01.219
have run these experiments and I've run them
00:41:01.219 --> 00:41:07.559
myself. I wanted to see, did the machine show
00:41:07.559 --> 00:41:11.260
the same kind of rule -based learning? that humans
00:41:11.260 --> 00:41:14.880
seem to have. And it doesn't. It actually does
00:41:14.880 --> 00:41:18.500
not show the same pattern at all. And what happens
00:41:18.500 --> 00:41:25.460
is that it kind of learns that a dash ed is what
00:41:25.460 --> 00:41:28.260
you put at the end of a past tense when you have
00:41:28.260 --> 00:41:30.559
a new word. But it doesn't always learn that
00:41:30.559 --> 00:41:34.179
the way children do. And a lot of it has to do
00:41:34.179 --> 00:41:38.449
with just how frequent the input is. to the system.
00:41:38.750 --> 00:41:41.530
So it has lots of goes and whens and whens and
00:41:41.530 --> 00:41:45.969
goes, then it learns that very well. And whether
00:41:45.969 --> 00:41:50.030
or not it's really learning a rule, or it's just
00:41:50.030 --> 00:41:53.730
learning because it heard this before, and it's
00:41:53.730 --> 00:41:55.650
general, it's not generalizing, but it's just
00:41:55.650 --> 00:41:58.590
using its own memory. So I think that's probably
00:41:58.590 --> 00:42:00.610
some of the experiments that you're talking about.
00:42:00.630 --> 00:42:04.750
And they're pretty central to the whole question
00:42:04.750 --> 00:42:07.809
of how how similar these systems are to human
00:42:07.809 --> 00:42:11.849
language processing, and the degree to which
00:42:11.849 --> 00:42:13.969
they can tell us something about human language
00:42:13.969 --> 00:42:21.429
processing. Love it. You have a podcast, which
00:42:21.429 --> 00:42:24.690
you do, when you're talking about the AI, the
00:42:24.690 --> 00:42:29.550
black box, if I'm not mistaken? Inside the black
00:42:29.550 --> 00:42:32.050
box. Inside the black box. Yeah, I have a substack,
00:42:32.050 --> 00:42:34.659
and I also just sort of put it into a podcast
00:42:34.659 --> 00:42:37.820
form as well. That's right. What made you want
00:42:37.820 --> 00:42:41.260
to use that method of delivery for the information
00:42:41.260 --> 00:42:44.559
until anybody who wants to learn more about it?
00:42:44.559 --> 00:42:47.480
What would they get out of it or they can expect
00:42:47.480 --> 00:42:51.039
to learn? Well, I've talked to people that read
00:42:51.039 --> 00:42:53.820
this or that listen to the podcast, and I think
00:42:53.820 --> 00:42:58.079
that there are a lot of people out there who
00:42:58.079 --> 00:43:02.780
are experts in their own fields. So doctors,
00:43:02.940 --> 00:43:06.360
lawyers, engineers, people like that and who
00:43:06.360 --> 00:43:11.239
are fascinated by AI but don't really understand
00:43:11.239 --> 00:43:14.300
much about the nuts and bolts of how it works.
00:43:14.900 --> 00:43:17.159
And so what I wanted to do and what I try to
00:43:17.159 --> 00:43:21.139
do is to pick a topic every week that's kind
00:43:21.139 --> 00:43:25.380
of a good explanation of some little aspect.
00:43:25.420 --> 00:43:27.679
So we were talking about the past tense that
00:43:27.679 --> 00:43:30.699
last week I posted some experiments that I had
00:43:30.699 --> 00:43:34.710
done. looking at learning of the past tense in
00:43:34.710 --> 00:43:37.429
AI systems and how that compares and contrasts
00:43:37.429 --> 00:43:40.110
what you see with kids and what that can tell
00:43:40.110 --> 00:43:42.849
you about what's going on inside those systems.
00:43:43.710 --> 00:43:47.750
So I think that in the end, people are really
00:43:47.750 --> 00:43:51.050
fascinated by these systems. But what surprises
00:43:51.050 --> 00:43:53.650
them and what I kind of focus on and inside the
00:43:53.650 --> 00:43:58.530
black box on Substack and the podcast is that
00:43:58.679 --> 00:44:02.760
even the people that created them do not fully
00:44:02.760 --> 00:44:05.820
understand how it is that they arrive at the
00:44:05.820 --> 00:44:09.360
solutions that they arrive at. And there's a
00:44:09.360 --> 00:44:12.340
whole field called mechanistic interpretability
00:44:12.340 --> 00:44:16.460
that aims to understand what's at, because, and
00:44:16.460 --> 00:44:18.719
the reason for that is simply that these systems
00:44:18.719 --> 00:44:22.300
have literally billions and billions of parameters.
00:44:22.460 --> 00:44:27.269
I mean, they have huge numbers of numbers, really
00:44:27.269 --> 00:44:31.230
large vectors being processed by these chips,
00:44:31.650 --> 00:44:37.090
by these GPUs. And so when you have a solution
00:44:37.090 --> 00:44:41.630
space that's that large, it's very difficult,
00:44:41.829 --> 00:44:44.250
unless everything is crisp and rule -based, which
00:44:44.250 --> 00:44:47.090
we don't think it is, it's very difficult to
00:44:47.090 --> 00:44:50.389
figure out exactly how it's learning because
00:44:50.389 --> 00:44:54.469
what these systems do is you give them the answer
00:44:54.760 --> 00:44:57.440
And then you see if they come up with the answer.
00:44:57.519 --> 00:44:59.440
And then if they don't, you adjust them a little
00:44:59.440 --> 00:45:03.119
bit and you just keep doing that repeatedly for
00:45:03.119 --> 00:45:06.199
literally trillions, sometimes trillions of iterations
00:45:06.199 --> 00:45:09.260
until when you put something in at the other
00:45:09.260 --> 00:45:12.420
end, you get something out and it makes sense.
00:45:12.780 --> 00:45:15.079
But what's going on in that in between with all
00:45:15.079 --> 00:45:18.739
those numbers is extremely complicated and very
00:45:18.739 --> 00:45:26.030
difficult to really fathom, I think. And so what
00:45:26.030 --> 00:45:28.969
I do in Inside the Black Box is try to talk a
00:45:28.969 --> 00:45:31.309
little bit about, you know, different topics
00:45:31.309 --> 00:45:34.289
in there and maybe make it a little bit less
00:45:34.289 --> 00:45:37.730
mysterious for people and a little less scary.
00:45:38.889 --> 00:45:44.250
I love it. So for everybody out there, they want
00:45:44.250 --> 00:45:47.909
to learn more. Where would you like them to go?
00:45:48.210 --> 00:45:53.079
And then also What's the number one misnomer
00:45:53.079 --> 00:45:58.719
that people have about AI? Well, so you can see
00:45:58.719 --> 00:46:02.400
the substack is inside the black box .ai. I also
00:46:02.400 --> 00:46:06.280
have an app called your voicecraft .ai, which
00:46:06.280 --> 00:46:08.280
you can go to and get a beta for and that will
00:46:08.280 --> 00:46:13.539
allow you to basically train a local model like
00:46:13.539 --> 00:46:15.500
what we were talking about to speak in your own
00:46:15.500 --> 00:46:21.460
voice and your written voice. As far as the things
00:46:21.460 --> 00:46:25.920
that I see people wrong about, I guess you could
00:46:25.920 --> 00:46:28.860
say about AI, I think it's not something to be
00:46:28.860 --> 00:46:31.840
scared of. There's a lot of very anti -AI sentiment,
00:46:32.719 --> 00:46:36.599
and I live in a kind of bubble where everyone
00:46:36.599 --> 00:46:38.380
thinks AI is great, and I have to keep reminding
00:46:38.380 --> 00:46:40.000
myself that there are a lot of people out there
00:46:40.000 --> 00:46:42.920
that don't think that AI is great. They're afraid
00:46:42.920 --> 00:46:45.079
it'll take away their jobs, which is an issue
00:46:45.079 --> 00:46:48.590
we've already discussed. They're afraid that
00:46:48.590 --> 00:46:51.690
it will somehow take over the world, which is
00:46:51.690 --> 00:46:58.309
pretty unlikely. And there are people who think,
00:46:58.309 --> 00:46:59.829
I think, that they're actually, in some sense,
00:47:00.010 --> 00:47:03.510
alive. And it's an actual entity that you're
00:47:03.510 --> 00:47:08.090
talking to. And that's just not the case. You're
00:47:08.090 --> 00:47:10.610
dealing with a computer. It's all ones and zeros.
00:47:10.690 --> 00:47:13.469
You're putting information into a huge register
00:47:13.469 --> 00:47:16.400
or stack. of computing elements, and you're getting
00:47:16.400 --> 00:47:19.699
something out. That's nothing like what the human
00:47:19.699 --> 00:47:22.360
brain does. It's much more complicated. Neurons
00:47:22.360 --> 00:47:26.000
are just these completely mysterious computational
00:47:26.000 --> 00:47:29.219
elements that do a lot more than what a computer
00:47:29.219 --> 00:47:32.000
does, and with a lot less power, as we've discussed.
00:47:32.480 --> 00:47:34.940
So I would say, my takeaways are, don't be scared.
00:47:35.119 --> 00:47:39.139
Learn it. Actually get to know the strengths
00:47:39.139 --> 00:47:42.670
and weaknesses of it. when you go in and start
00:47:42.670 --> 00:47:45.130
playing with it and trying to get responses from
00:47:45.130 --> 00:47:47.969
it, you begin to get a sort of sense of its personality.
00:47:48.110 --> 00:47:49.929
I don't like to say personality, but I'll say
00:47:49.929 --> 00:47:53.389
personality because it's not a human, but it's
00:47:53.389 --> 00:47:56.849
sort of personality and the sorts of ways that
00:47:56.849 --> 00:47:59.789
it responds to the things that you say. And I
00:47:59.789 --> 00:48:03.090
think that helps to demystify it and make it
00:48:03.090 --> 00:48:06.349
a lot less scary for a lot of people. So that
00:48:06.349 --> 00:48:11.639
would be my take home. But Dr. Blackwell, I appreciate
00:48:11.639 --> 00:48:17.639
your time and you giving me inside perspective
00:48:17.639 --> 00:48:21.000
to this, which I've learned some more things
00:48:21.000 --> 00:48:25.059
today and just even how to just look at AI. And
00:48:25.059 --> 00:48:28.800
I'm glad that I've been prompting like pretty
00:48:28.800 --> 00:48:30.820
correctly. Yeah, I like your prompt. The way
00:48:30.820 --> 00:48:33.699
you've been prompting is very good. I mean, that's
00:48:33.699 --> 00:48:37.829
what I do. So I'm on the right path. I like that.
00:48:40.190 --> 00:48:42.590
Absolutely. Everybody out there, y 'all can go
00:48:42.590 --> 00:48:45.369
check out Inside the Black Box podcast. I have
00:48:45.369 --> 00:48:48.190
it all description and linked in the show. And
00:48:48.190 --> 00:48:50.829
then also you said you're on Substack as well.
00:48:51.750 --> 00:48:54.469
That the Inside the Black Box .ai is Substack.
00:48:54.530 --> 00:48:57.190
But if you do Inside the Black Box, you'll also
00:48:57.190 --> 00:48:59.409
if you do a podcast search, you'll find it as
00:48:59.409 --> 00:49:03.329
a podcast as well on Apple Spotify. and y 'all
00:49:03.329 --> 00:49:05.409
can go and check it out. If you want to learn
00:49:05.409 --> 00:49:08.909
more, you got questions, think of nature, get
00:49:08.909 --> 00:49:11.690
up Dr. Blackwell, I'm sure he would respond whenever
00:49:11.690 --> 00:49:14.570
he has free time. Yeah, absolutely. Substack
00:49:14.570 --> 00:49:17.429
actually has a mailing system, so you can DM
00:49:17.429 --> 00:49:19.869
me if you want. That's what's up. So you got
00:49:19.869 --> 00:49:22.610
a system in place for everything. Yeah, that's
00:49:22.610 --> 00:49:25.710
right. I try to. I love it. You're going to learn
00:49:25.710 --> 00:49:28.440
how to be more efficient out here using AI. I'm
00:49:28.440 --> 00:49:30.619
your host, Andreas. But think that radio show
00:49:30.619 --> 00:49:33.619
has been music and business talk in covering,
00:49:33.619 --> 00:49:36.679
you know, AI. When I started my first independent
00:49:36.679 --> 00:49:38.739
record label, I was folding shirts at Old Navy,
00:49:38.920 --> 00:49:41.099
slipping handmade compilation CDs, straight into
00:49:41.099 --> 00:49:43.500
customer shopping bags just to secure my first
00:49:43.500 --> 00:49:46.019
sales. I had zero budget, but I had an infinite
00:49:46.019 --> 00:49:49.579
drive. But today I see so many solopreneurs running
00:49:49.579 --> 00:49:52.280
on social media, treadmills, posting content
00:49:52.280 --> 00:49:55.320
for free and praying that algorithm smiles on
00:49:55.320 --> 00:49:57.969
them. That's not a business plan. That's hope
00:49:57.969 --> 00:49:59.969
marketing. If you don't pay to advertise and
00:49:59.969 --> 00:50:02.409
build search engine infrastructure, you are paying
00:50:02.409 --> 00:50:05.550
with your manual labor hours instead. Stop building
00:50:05.550 --> 00:50:08.409
on rented land. I put my entire 10 -year field
00:50:08.409 --> 00:50:11.710
manual on pay hip called I Can Do Bad All By
00:50:11.710 --> 00:50:15.210
Myself to show you exactly how to build a sovereign
00:50:15.210 --> 00:50:17.909
empire you own outright. Comment the word link
00:50:17.909 --> 00:50:20.070
below and I will instantly DM you the link to
00:50:20.070 --> 00:50:21.769
grab your copy for $19 .99.